Re: CrimewatchVXL V6 link=topic=118597.msg1504715#msg1504715 date=1381954923]
I'm with H21 (I agree with his statements).
But my answer to your question / my interpretation of your question, 'Why would anyone walk back to the crèche with a 'kidnapped' child' would be 'Because they were meeting someone / the purchaser of the child'
I apologise if I misinterpreted your question.
[/quote]
Walking a circuitous route, near the creche would be a good cover for several reasons
If stopped, the kidnapper could argue that they had found the child in the street, and knowing the area and the existence of the creche were taking said lost child to the creche whilst the parents were located.
It wasn't so late that going to the creche would seem too odd.
Walking back from the creche towards town and the second sighting would also raise few questions, again if stopped, just collected my child from the creche, our appartment is just down here.
The circuitous route also reduces being spotted from the pool area, or by anyone checking their own kids.
BUTWhat really makes no sense is why walk halfway around a holiday resort at dinnertime whilst carrying someone elses kid. That's just too retarded, to even be plausible...especially seeing as it must have been organised.
Even if it was a burglary gone wrong, chancing one (that exact apartment is beyond coincidental), they would have had a vehicle outside ready to go
Poll
Author
Topic: Crimewatch (Read 9016 times)