Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MAF mod question.  (Read 1601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
MAF mod question.
« on: 25 October 2013, 18:00:04 »

Was having this discussion the other day with some Mates and where divided on the answer, so I'd though I'd ask here.

If you increase the cross section diameter (area) of a MAF sensor housing, would the sensor still read the correct air flow volume?
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36419
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #1 on: 25 October 2013, 18:44:17 »

Was having this discussion the other day with some Mates and where divided on the answer, so I'd though I'd ask here.

If you increase the cross section diameter (area) of a MAF sensor housing, would the sensor still read the correct air flow volume?

No, because it's the velocity of the air through the housing and its' effect on the sensor element that it being measured. Different diameter means more air volume for the same velocity.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #2 on: 25 October 2013, 20:03:27 »

Thanks Kevin, that was my way of thinking, ie the sensor has to be calibrated to the given volume of air passing through it in order to correctly measure the air volume, the opposition was that it was irrelevant as the sensor will only measure air speed and the ECU is calibrated to work out mas air volume.
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #3 on: 25 October 2013, 20:17:38 »

Was having this discussion the other day with some Mates and where divided on the answer, so I'd though I'd ask here.

If you increase the cross section diameter (area) of a MAF sensor housing, would the sensor still read the correct air flow volume?

No, because it's the velocity of the air through the housing and its' effect on the sensor element that it being measured. Different diameter means more air volume for the same velocity.

agreed..  but lambda readings will correct ecu after sometime...
Logged

Broomies Mate

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol, UK
  • Posts: 3840
    • Stuff!
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #4 on: 25 October 2013, 21:09:41 »

Was having this discussion the other day with some Mates and where divided on the answer, so I'd though I'd ask here.

If you increase the cross section diameter (area) of a MAF sensor housing, would the sensor still read the correct air flow volume?

No, because it's the velocity of the air through the housing and its' effect on the sensor element that it being measured. Different diameter means more air volume for the same velocity.

agreed..  but lambda readings will correct ecu after sometime...

The exhaust readings will have nothing to do with it.  The MAF script in the ECU will be quite precise..... anything above or below the 'required' level will turn a light on!
Logged
2004 Saab 9-5 Aero Merlot Red Stg1 noobtune
2009 Saab 9-5 Turbo Edition Titan Grey Stg3 noobtune
2017 Vauxhall Vivaro L1H1 125PS Star Silver

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #5 on: 25 October 2013, 22:10:04 »

Was having this discussion the other day with some Mates and where divided on the answer, so I'd though I'd ask here.

If you increase the cross section diameter (area) of a MAF sensor housing, would the sensor still read the correct air flow volume?

No, because it's the velocity of the air through the housing and its' effect on the sensor element that it being measured. Different diameter means more air volume for the same velocity.

agreed..  but lambda readings will correct ecu after sometime...

The exhaust readings will have nothing to do with it.  The MAF script in the ECU will be quite precise..... anything above or below the 'required' level will turn a light on!

why do you think there is a lambda sensor ::)
Logged

bigegg

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Leeds
  • Posts: 1218
    • MV6 RIP - Lexus GS300 '99
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #6 on: 25 October 2013, 22:18:04 »


agreed..  but lambda readings will correct ecu after sometime...

The exhaust readings will have nothing to do with it.  The MAF script in the ECU will be quite precise..... anything above or below the 'required' level will turn a light on!

why do you think there is a lambda sensor ::)
[/quote]

To adjust for engine and air temperature, which will change the volume of air for a given mass of air.
Logged
Carpe Incendium

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34021
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #7 on: 26 October 2013, 21:37:32 »

Maf sensors measure air mass by sensing the cooling effect of the air on a sensor, the sensor is normally internally calibrated so a voltage corresponds to a set mass. If the replacement sensor had the same voltage/mass ratio then no issue
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #8 on: 26 October 2013, 21:56:46 »

So if you replace the intake with one that has the same cross section as, say a VXR8, then as long as you use the VXR8 maf sensor then all is well :-\
Logged

Broomies Mate

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol, UK
  • Posts: 3840
    • Stuff!
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #9 on: 27 October 2013, 00:31:39 »

So if you replace the intake with one that has the same cross section as, say a VXR8, then as long as you use the VXR8 maf sensor then all is well :-\

I honestly wouldn't have a clue.  But judging by how quirky MAF's are on the Omega (same as most cars), I'd suggest it would be a pissing nightmare!  ;D
Logged
2004 Saab 9-5 Aero Merlot Red Stg1 noobtune
2009 Saab 9-5 Turbo Edition Titan Grey Stg3 noobtune
2017 Vauxhall Vivaro L1H1 125PS Star Silver

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36419
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #10 on: 27 October 2013, 00:43:30 »

So if you replace the intake with one that has the same cross section as, say a VXR8, then as long as you use the VXR8 maf sensor then all is well :-\

I honestly wouldn't have a clue.  But judging by how quirky MAF's are on the Omega (same as most cars), I'd suggest it would be a pissing nightmare!  ;D

... and a hiding to nothing. I very much doubt that the MAF airflow is the weakest point when it comes to breathing.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Spireite

  • Guest
Re: MAF mod question.
« Reply #11 on: 27 October 2013, 16:52:14 »

I removed the mesh once on my vectra gsi, made a definite difference, elm light only came on when booting up a dual carriageway.  The square mesh must restrict by a third, but is designed to straighten out the flow of air, create smooth flow instead of turbulence.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.