Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Omega number 2  (Read 3690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

PAULCDX

  • Guest
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #30 on: 24 December 2013, 19:01:56 »

Sounds like you've had a good buy Dan  :y

Are you keeping your CDX also ?  ;)
Logged

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #31 on: 24 December 2013, 19:11:04 »

Yeah mate the Cdx ain't going anywhere. Just bought it to do a few odd jobs on the cheap and sell on. Didn't pay a lot for it so plans are to check and top up ATF, oil and filter changed, fix glovebox, full valet and see what I can get for her.  8)
Logged

PAULCDX

  • Guest
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #32 on: 24 December 2013, 19:32:06 »

Lovely mate  :y

Hope to catch you at a meet or something in the new year, maybe at Jon's or Dave's ?  :D  ;D
Logged

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #33 on: 24 December 2013, 19:49:40 »

I'm up for that buddy. ;)
Logged

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12729
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #34 on: 25 December 2013, 00:16:23 »

Nice motor there Dan  :y

What, in your opinion, is the difference between the V6 and the 4 cylinder?

Tunnie said it's more than capable and as I imagine I drive like him I'm thinking this would be ok for me too (thinking about the future ;)). But would be excellent to get as many views on the difference from as many as poss. :)
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #35 on: 25 December 2013, 05:31:27 »

Nice motor there Dan  :y

What, in your opinion, is the difference between the V6 and the 4 cylinder?

Tunnie said it's more than capable and as I imagine I drive like him I'm thinking this would be ok for me too (thinking about the future ;)). But would be excellent to get as many views on the difference from as many as poss. :)

It's just adequate mate. It's cruises nicely but it didn't want to be rushed. Very quiet and good mpg on a run. I'd happily have one.
Logged

2boxerdogs

  • Guest
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #36 on: 25 December 2013, 17:41:59 »

Nice motor there Dan  :y

What, in your opinion, is the difference between the V6 and the 4 cylinder?

Tunnie said it's more than capable and as I imagine I drive like him I'm thinking this would be ok for me too (thinking about the future ;)). But would be excellent to get as many views on the difference from as many as poss. :)
I think that after a V6 you would be disappointed with it, the fuel difference is hardly noticeable & the V6 even seems to handle better.I know I would miss the grunt of the V6, really depends what you are looking for if it  is better mpg don't bother..
Logged

Dan282

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Stoke on trent
  • Posts: 544
    • 2001 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #37 on: 25 December 2013, 17:49:05 »

I would always look for a v6 first if I ever sold mine but if a mint hi spec 2.2 came up is certainly consider it. My 5000 miles a year doesn't really warrant the v6 but I do love it and the monthly journey to Dudley is always a pleasure.  ;)
Logged

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12729
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #38 on: 25 December 2013, 18:00:55 »

It's interesting how people's reports of them are that they're pretty slow compared to the V6. The stats suggest the 4 cylinders are only behind the V6 by a second
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12729
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #39 on: 25 December 2013, 18:01:28 »

*Edit*

......on the 0-62 dash  :y
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #40 on: 25 December 2013, 21:42:33 »

I regularly switch between 3.2 and 2.2, never disappointed when I jump in my 2.2, smooth, comfy, excellent pence per mile thanks to LPG.

3.2 is a different beast though, it's so easy to be very quick and fully loaded 4 up, with full boot, just goes really really well. 2.2 will struggle there, but with just me in it, goes fine.
Logged

PAULCDX

  • Guest
Re: Omega number 2
« Reply #41 on: 26 December 2013, 19:32:41 »

Having owned the 2.2 and now 2.6 I have to be honest that I haven't noticed much difference in fuel economy  :y

I wouldn't hesitate in owning another 2.2 if I had to but I would miss the grunt and power of the V6 tho  :D  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 17 queries.