Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0  (Read 2428 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« on: 22 February 2014, 23:11:32 »

Well despite me not having a good stzrt to the day today, on the way to a job up the M11, was greeted with a Dang, Dang, Knock, Crunch, Crunch, Big Bang, followed  by the Batt light comimg on.

So thinking Aux Belt, eyes on the Temp waiting for the increase, did 't take long before straight in the red, so pulled over and inspected the damage.

Tensioner totally melted, and what a right mess the Aux Belt made. Limped it back toa friends place, then off to get some bits from the Plod Breaker (3.0) to get me out of trouble forthe weekend.

Now the problem seems to be, unless Im having a brain F moment that the belt seems too small for the 3.2 by about a good inch, surely the adjustment will not cater for that?, to make matters worse the 3.2 tensioner, mimus the pulley is jammed solid, do I need to double nut lock it to release it anti cockwise?, too dark now.

Did the 3.0 have smaller belts?, or am I missing something here.
Logged

jb

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • bucks
  • Posts: 249
    • 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #1 on: 23 February 2014, 06:54:40 »

if 3.0 has a/c belt should be the same at 2200mm if memory is right.Non a/c shorter by a at least 400mm. They do stretch over time esp when tensioner fails!!
Logged

terry paget

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midsomer Norton Somerset
  • Posts: 4633
    • 3 Astras 2 Vectra
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #2 on: 23 February 2014, 07:21:12 »

I have had similar failures on a 3.0 and a 2.5. The pulley nut (15mm?) should simply unscrew from the tensioner arm, and the new one screw in. Getting on a new belt is always tricky because they are unstretched. I have had to get wife to hold pulley tensioner lever fully clockwise (I find her a long breaker bar) while I lever the belt over the last pulley with a tyre lever.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #3 on: 23 February 2014, 11:09:18 »

Some after market belts are a bit shorter, putting the tensioner almost at the end of travel.
Logged
Grumpy old man

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #4 on: 23 February 2014, 11:13:00 »

Thanks all, just going to finish me Tea, then off to have another go armed with a Crowbar and Mike the Mallet.  ;)
« Last Edit: 23 February 2014, 11:15:53 by zirk »
Logged

jb

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • bucks
  • Posts: 249
    • 3.2 Elite
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #5 on: 23 February 2014, 12:25:27 »

And of course the secrte is to put the bely over all the pulleys except the water pump leaving this to last and gently sliding the smooth belt face over this smooth pulley..........
Logged

Andy H

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Auckland
  • Posts: 5533
    • Mazda MPV
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #6 on: 23 February 2014, 13:53:48 »

And of course the secret is to put the belt over all the pulleys except the water pump leaving this to last and gently sliding the smooth belt face over this smooth pulley..........
:y

If you have to resort to brute force to get the belt on then you have the wrong belt and you can expect the bearings in the alternator and water pump to wear more quickly as a result.
Logged
"Deja Moo - The feeling that you've heard this bull somewhere before."

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #7 on: 24 February 2014, 00:27:41 »

Ok, sorted.

Turns out the tensioner wasn't budging due the melted plastic of the tensioner wheel reforming and setting around it, makings a near perfect plastic molded filler.

Once all dug out, tensioner was free to move again and new belt fitted on no time.

Think I might add a Tensioner and Belt with the Crank Sensor and other bits to carry around in the Mobile Spares Kit, considering the amount of grief it causes and for a relatively easy fix.

Thanks again all for your replies.   ;)

Logged

terry paget

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midsomer Norton Somerset
  • Posts: 4633
    • 3 Astras 2 Vectra
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #8 on: 24 February 2014, 08:28:14 »

Your failure demonstrated the reason why we change our cam belts and pulleys every 40,000 miles. Failure of the aux belt tensioner pulley bearing is not catastrophic, just inconvenient. I have had two fail, and now change my aux belt pulleys every 40,000 miles, it's an easy job and a cheap part.
Logged

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #9 on: 24 February 2014, 11:53:52 »

Your failure demonstrated the reason why we change our cam belts and pulleys every 40,000 miles. Failure of the aux belt tensioner pulley bearing is not catastrophic, just inconvenient. I have had two fail, and now change my aux belt pulleys every 40,000 miles, it's an easy job and a cheap part.

Totally agree Terry, the previous Owner had a Full service and Conti Cam Kit change less than 5000 miles ago.

Apart from being in bits the Aux Belt looks brand new, difficult to tell with the Pulley as its reformed itself from meltdown mode, the centre Bearing on the Pulley looks new and  perfect and as still spinning nice and freely?

Edit: Checked History, Aux Belt and Tensioner changed, August 2013.
« Last Edit: 24 February 2014, 12:03:38 by zirk »
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #10 on: 24 February 2014, 12:17:19 »

Cheapy chinese clone part if it only lasted six months  :-\
Logged

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11443
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #11 on: 24 February 2014, 12:27:38 »

Cheapy chinese clone part if it only lasted six months  :-\

Quiet possibly, the one on there now is off the 3.0 Plod Breaker, 62K FSH, so think I'll leave that on there for now.  ::)
Logged

terry paget

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midsomer Norton Somerset
  • Posts: 4633
    • 3 Astras 2 Vectra
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #12 on: 24 February 2014, 17:58:59 »

Your failure demonstrated the reason why we change our cam belts and pulleys every 40,000 miles. Failure of the aux belt tensioner pulley bearing is not catastrophic, just inconvenient. I have had two fail, and now change my aux belt pulleys every 40,000 miles, it's an easy job and a cheap part.

Totally agree Terry, the previous Owner had a Full service and Conti Cam Kit change less than 5000 miles ago.

Apart from being in bits the Aux Belt looks brand new, difficult to tell with the Pulley as its reformed itself from meltdown mode, the centre Bearing on the Pulley looks new and  perfect and as still spinning nice and freely?

Edit: Checked History, Aux Belt and Tensioner changed, August 2013.
Interesting. I always assumed that the bearing seized first, causing the pulley to disintegrate.
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34012
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Tensioner Fail and Belt question 3.2 vs 3.0
« Reply #13 on: 25 February 2014, 09:20:31 »

The way bearings seize they can often grab, lock up and then free off again, particularly if the internal support cage has thrown the towel in.....plus of course when you spin them in your hand there is no load on them.

Its a pretty common part used by loads of manufacturers actualy so easy to get but genuine was only circa 25 notes last time I looked.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.152 seconds with 17 queries.