Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[JamesV6CDX]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

[Entwood]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO ..

[Steve B]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

I Dont blame Him 

[STEMO]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

I Dont blame Him 

  Attaboy, Steve, you're learning.

[henryd]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO ..

Anyone with a VW............Oh shit,thats me gone too

[Shackeng]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO ..

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie?

[Entwood]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO ..

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie?

Nah .. an invite to the OOF Xmas party .. 

[Terbs]

Irrespective of the why's and wherefore's, etc, of bans or whatever the circumstances of leaving....I personally got on well with Chris and H. He helped me and gave me advice, and was a workhorse at the Wycombe meetings, always helping someone. I only speak as I find

[zirk]

I think he was just felt embarrassed,                         .............having to live in Reading.

[ozzycat]

I allways got on well with Chris he helped me a lot and supported me when I was starting to get realy bad it's a shame realy he a very good chap I hope he dose come back

[biggriffin]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO ..

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie?

Nah .. an invite to the Hoof' land Xmas party .. 

Fixed. Still places.

[Shackeng]

I allways got on well with Chris he helped me a lot and supported me when I was starting to get realy bad it's a shame realy he a very good chap I hope he dose come back

[/highlight]

Agreed, he drove down to mine and fitted two lots of rear suspension bushes, in exchange for a pub lunch, which he didn't get as they had stopped serving! If you read this Chris the offer still stands.

[tigers_gonads]

What the opps is wrong with Gixer anyway 

Alright, he pissed me off with that "hen pecking" comment so I offered him some cream for his itchy fanny 

I remember the innuendo's about TuBy and Oilman too 

Did I miss something else or is it a secret 

[Doctor Gollum]

As I understand it, it wasn't TB that banned him

[TheBoy]

I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

Don't feel left out, he's rude to everyone