Jimmy, I challenge your figures: but even if you are somewhere near right (you ain't!)
Challenge away Ron. After all, a forum is about exchanging views and information, but please show your working
https://micpohling.wordpress.com/2007/03/27/math-how-much-co2-is-emitted-by-human-on-earth-annually/This blog walks through the total CO2 per human based on 2 scenarios and comes up with a figure of either 2.168 x 10^9 tonnes/year or 1.362 x 10^9 tonnes/year. Granted, a huge difference depensing on how you calculate it. Both calculations are done from first principles so not really open to politicising. That compares to 24.136 x 10^9 tonnes per year through burning fossils. Or somewhere between 5.6% and 8.9%. Add in all the other sources of CO2 (animals, especially those bred for food), volcanic activity etc etc and the figure from human breathing is likely to be well below 5%, so actually less than I had asserted.
I don't think a figure as high as you claim (over 95%) bears up to even casual scrutiny. Take food animals for a start, the UN estimates that there are 19 billion chickens in the world (or about 2.4 for every human), similarly, there are 1.5 billion cows (UN again), or about 0.2 for every human. So how could they contribute a tiny fraction (less than 1% according to your estimate) of the CO2 compared to the amount we do?
The Institute of Mechanical Engineers reckoned that transport accounts for about 25% of all the UK's co2 emissions and that doesn't include foreign-owned airlines (who's CO2 is attributed to their "home" country). This seems about on par with the USA's Environmental Protection Agency figure of 28% for the US (fewer foreign-owned airlines operating in the US per mile flown).
How will the government raid our wallets without VAT and Excise Duty on fuel when that happens - after all, it will be exactly what they CLAIM that they want - lower "pollution"?
Ron.
Ah! now that's an easy one. Charge pence per mile driven, with different charges depending on class of vehicle. All they have to do is pass a black-box law and its done. Sure, it might be against our human rights to have the government spying on us, but that won't be an issue in a couple of years now will it
![Wink ;)](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/wink.gif)
Stop/Start and Hybrids are a good start in reducing this sort of pollution and Nick W may well be right that Volvo's announcement is a cynical marketing ploy, but it is a statement of intent and a step in the right direction IMHO!
This is bang on the money imo. I fervently hope that electric (or later hydrogen) cars will do for petrol motors what the car did for the horse. Electrics will take over as the day-to-day beasts of burden and the petrol cars will be things of pleasure, to be used as a hobby and
enjoyed. I really enjoy driving, I've been on track days, drove that M140i for 250 miles through wales on a whim, but I would welcome an electric self-driving car to take me along my M42, M6 and M1 commute each day, in silent relaxed comfort while I read a book, watched a film or caught up on some email. I would defy anyone to derive pleasure from that kind of driving
![Grin ;D](http://images.omegaowners.com/forum/smf2000/Smileys/oofstd/grin.gif)
.