Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Andy B]

The solution gave me flashbacks of thirty years ago when I could just about solve it myself. Which makes me feel really old.

It was probably nearer 40 years ago for me ..... hence now having no idea where to even start.

[biggriffin]

first one is worked out as

x² evaluated between 13 and 10.  In other words 13² less 10² = 69

.... dull.....

.

I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?

let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...

You wouldn't be looking at her face?

My thoughts exactly 

Don't look at the mantle piece,while poking the fire. 

[ronnyd]

The solution gave me flashbacks of thirty years ago when I could just about solve it myself. Which makes me feel really old.

It was probably nearer 40 years ago for me ..... hence now having no idea where to even start.

Nearly 50 for me so not a bl**dy clue.

[Rods2]

I never once thought that I would be re-introduced to the "joys" of integral calculus on here.
My nightmares has started again: I must go and lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.....

Ron.

Where you taught electronics for a Nightmare on Elm Street evening recall some of the maths when designing complex control systems.

[Kevin Wood]

I never once thought that I would be re-introduced to the "joys" of integral calculus on here.
My nightmares has started again: I must go and lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.....

Ron.

Where you taught electronics for a Nightmare on Elm Street evening recall some of the maths when designing complex control systems.

I'd a bloody good job I barely ever dropped a mark on the computing and general electronics papers at university because they compensated for the fact that I just CBA to wade through all the maths.