It's all well and good being pissed off and outraged about everything, but posting about it with no reference to back it up, you may as well be yelling out of the car window on a motorway.
The internet ifs full of people getting outraged every time Donald says something, this is no different but not one person has referenced a clip of him actually saying what has gotten everyone outraged.
He deliberately says things to bait people whether it's the media or other leaders, and everyone bites every single time. He's the political version of Michael O'Leary.
If he's said something out of line, link to it and we can have an actual discussion about it rather than being sheep on the outrage bus.
I think everybody has seen the clips about him saying NATO troops weren't on the front line in the US led Afgan affair 
I genuinely hadn't seen what he said, but when you look now, it's all this type of thing...
https://share.google/FwLLOwik80uLh8Vh7Which is just contrived nonsense. He's always had an issue with NATO, I took this to be another dig, and that everyone is upset because, by implication, it suggests that we weren't involved. This is obviously wrong because, of all the NATO countries, we were right there with them. That is indisputable.
The question that isn't being asked is does NATO as a whole pull it's weight, or does it always fall to the same few countries that step up when asked, ourselves being the front of that line? That may well have been the intent of whatever he said.
Trouble is, after the fact, the outrage drowns out whatever was said to begin with making it almost impossible to have a reasonable discussion about anything.
To Steve's first post, all that's visible, is people at Davos, apparently yesterday, getting uppity about tarrifs that had already been withdrawn. The broader issue being that we keep being spoon fed what they want us to see.