Whichever way it is played BO is the best choice, if the other chap gets in the nutter becomes vice president.
TBH if any of them need shooting try the nutty cow in the other party
Not really very pleasant, Martin. 
I don't agree with all she says, but she is the only one of the 4 in the president/vice president race that does not buy into the great global warming scam, so nutter she is not.
I have read enough - she IS a nut job, like it or not, for a starter she is a creationist and that should be enough to prevent her having public office.
Christians, and most other faiths for that matter, believe in an ultimate deity. That does not necessarily compel them to believe that a deity created the universe, but many do. Palin expressly said that creationism should not be part of the curriculum (in Alaska), but if the issue came up she would have no problem in it being debated. Barack Obama is self-confessed Christian, who claims to pray daily. Of course, science itself preaches a form of creationism: Stephen Hawking says that "The universe can spontaneously create itself out of nothing." I don't want to get into a religious debate here - indeed I won't as I believe spiritual matters are personal. But, it would seem that both Palin and Obama claim to be Christians. If you think believers are nutters, then that's fine, but you'd need to tar both with the same brush.
I just hate all this sensationalist muck-raking. I want to hear about economic policies, foreign policies and so on. Not all this personal gobshite.