My politics are biased to achieving "the greatest good" in line with Bentham's utilitarianism, so you sacrifice one life to save five!

However, I would hate to have to make that decision if it mean't the death of that one person, when you have to consider the morality involved, along with the rights of liberty, freedom and justice for the individual under God given laws as Locke envisaged. 8-) 8-)
I am sure the circumstances of the situation, such as war, must greatly infuence any individuals ability to make such judgement.
However a decision of this type always makes me think of the infamous hot air ballon challenge:
A hot air ballon needs to lighten its load to avoid crashing into a mountain range below. There are five people, of the same physical weight, in the ballon and it is calculated that the weight of one, if removed from the ballon, would save the balloon from unavoidable disaster. The people have therefore to decide who should be removed from the basket by working out each others "worth" in society and deciding who can be sacrificed.

Apparently this challenge has been used in Special Forces Training and made as real as possible by the instructors, which is a most unpleasant thought!
