Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Martin_1962]

Doing a stress test with an MPEG encoder

2 pass VBR with highest quality is running at over 50 frames a second, all 4 cores maxed, while writing this.

This means that at fixed bit rate it could encode real time

Remember best quality settings not speed

Quick settings about 2 minutes for a 5 minute clip

[cem_devecioglu]

Cpu ?

[Martin_1962]

OK

Asus P5QL-E
Intel Q8200 (wanted Q6600 but none available)
2 x Samsung 1TB drives

[waspy]

Doing a stress test with an MPEG encoder

2 pass VBR with highest quality is running at over 50 frames a second, all 4 cores maxed, while writing this.

This means that at fixed bit rate it could encode real time

Remember best quality settings not speed

Quick settings about 2 minutes for a 5 minute clip

That looks all very impressive, but i have no idea what you're talking about. Could i have a decoded in English version please

[HolyCount]

Doing a stress test with an MPEG encoder

2 pass VBR with highest quality is running at over 50 frames a second, all 4 cores maxed, while writing this.

This means that at fixed bit rate it could encode real time

Remember best quality settings not speed

Quick settings about 2 minutes for a 5 minute clip

That looks all very impressive, but i have no idea what you're talking about. Could i have a decoded in English version please

The english version is the post title, i.e "New PC is quick"  

[cem_devecioglu]

OK

Asus P5QL-E
Intel Q8200 (wanted Q6600 but none available)
2 x Samsung 1TB drives

heavy weight..

quad cpu and a good board..can be used as a server..

[Marks DTM Calib]

Its interesting as it just shows how inefficent these universal micros are....a DSP, good RISC or FPGA design would murder that little task.

[Martin_1962]

Its interesting as it just shows how inefficent these universal micros are....a DSP, good RISC or FPGA design would murder that little task.

Just remember I am running it at best for everything and going for a lowish bit rate for disc space

[cem_devecioglu]

Its interesting as it just shows how inefficent these universal micros are....a DSP, good RISC or FPGA design would murder that little task.

for specific tasks RISCS are better..thats true..

todays pc processors really have a very wide application set.

but trying to develop a multitier distributed application with assembler

language under a RISC platform would be a fireball to gulp..

and still I would prefer an X86 chip in my miggy with a keyboard

and monitor connected to it..

[cem_devecioglu]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

[Marks DTM Calib]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

Yup....the closest to high level languages i get is assembler...I still do the occasional bit of machine code!

I take it that you are RISC adverse then Cem

[Mr Skrunts]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

Yup....the closest to high level languages i get is assembler...I still do the occasional bit of machine code!

I take it that you are RISC adverse then Cem

Out of interest what spec/build machines do you guys run for yourselves.  Or anyone else for that matter.

[Marks DTM Calib]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

Yup....the closest to high level languages i get is assembler...I still do the occasional bit of machine code!

I take it that you are RISC adverse then Cem

Out of interest what spec/build machines do you guys run for yourselves.  Or anyone else for that matter.

Nothing fancy....I only do a bit of CAD, run office apps and browser stuff.

Home is a 4 year old HP 3.2Ghz unit with 2G ram and 500G Samsung Sata drive.

Work is an IBM X31 laptop.....soon to be replaced with a HP.

[cem_devecioglu]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

Yup....the closest to high level languages i get is assembler...I still do the occasional bit of machine code!

I take it that you are RISC adverse then Cem

nope..I like RISC assembly as their instruction set and memory

models are far simpler to use..

But problem is, in this country RISC programmers cant find good

salary jobs except the military area.. :-/  

[cem_devecioglu]

and electronic engineers are lucky by school as they see RISC assembly coding in lectures..

Yup....the closest to high level languages i get is assembler...I still do the occasional bit of machine code!

I take it that you are RISC adverse then Cem

Out of interest what spec/build machines do you guys run for yourselves.  Or anyone else for that matter.

In home

3 pc's   ..


1 P4  1.6 1GB  Ram Dual 300 GB disk  

1 P4 3.0 hyperthreading 1GB many disks  (Server dual op system) (sometimes my wife use)

1 Core duo 1.8  1GB dual disk multimedia and development machine..

All disks 7200 RPM

In job

p4 3.0 2GB  Ram SCSI 15K RPM dual 80 GB disk  for develeopment

and some servers (that part is long)

main work is on development for software and database..