Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: ...who said there is no replacement for the Omega?  (Read 3824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
...who said there is no replacement for the Omega?
« on: 08 January 2007, 10:58:37 »

http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/reviews/Review.aspx?model=1265

Get one of these on 05/55 plates.... can't cost much can it? OK so it's rare, and a tad smaller inside (and the estate/tourer version will be much smaller then the meega), but the concept is good and performance will be much better then our 'meegas... so how about it? Only downside I see for the DIY mechanic is that second-hand bits engines (or engine bits) will not be lieng around in heaps at the local scrappie...



« Last Edit: 08 January 2007, 10:59:39 by markjay »
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #1 on: 08 January 2007, 11:02:33 »

From the sales brochure:

-------------------------------------------------

The 4.6 litre 90 degree V8 features a cross-bolted bottom end for enhanced rigidity and refinement, with large valve alloy cylinder heads ensuring good engine breathing in conjunction with a low back pressure, stainless steel exhaust system and a low loss intake system. This unit develops 260 Ps and 410 Nm of torque, that is fed to the road through the rear-wheels.  Rover's unique traction control system - fitted as standard - ensures that this considerable torque is deployed to good effect, whatever the conditions, whilst delivering rapid acceleration up to a top speed in excess of 150mph.

As befits a car designed to offer 'power in reserve', the powerunit has been sourced from the iconic Ford Mustang; a proven unit, extensively modified to suit the Rover 75 platfom and the critical demands of Rover's discerning customers.

-------------------------------------------------
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #2 on: 08 January 2007, 11:05:28 »

Performance figures:

4.6 V8 (4601cc)  / 260Ps @ 5000rpm  / 410Nm @ 4000rpm

4.6 V8 Automatic - 0-60 in 6.8 sec, max speed 151 mph

I like it....  :)
 

Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #3 on: 08 January 2007, 11:14:26 »

Clarkson love it too, i think these are going for silly money now, like 5k millers for less than 15k!

Rover had the guts to put a fat V8 the 75, just wish GM had done the same with the Omega  :(
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34010
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #4 on: 08 January 2007, 11:26:45 »

Its a Rover 75......get a Monaro....
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #5 on: 08 January 2007, 12:11:59 »

Quote
Its a Rover 75......get a Monaro....


...on a 55 plate with 5k miles for under £15,000...?
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #6 on: 08 January 2007, 12:34:52 »

On a more serious note, the Monaro is a coupe, and as such is a sporty-looking two-door and not the right car for me. I'm after a conservatively styled four-door saloon that does NOT look like it's The Business in the performance department.

My ideal car would have been the M5, but apart from ridiculous buying and running costs the last M5 that was nearly indistinguishable from the standard 520 was the early eightees first generation, the new ones look two intimidating for my taste.

The obvious choice for me was either a Granada (and I had an F-reg 2.9 Scorpio as a company car many years ago), or the Omega. The Granada got canceled first - not taking into accopunt the latest ugly-duckling model - and this left the Omega of which I had two over the last eight years.

Talking of the Monaro again, the right model for me would have been the back-to-its-roots Holden, now there's a proper Omega with V8 engine, but not for £50k... so it back to the drawing board for me, with the current contenders being the 300C (it's a Mercedes underneath, a new cost cost around £30, there lot's of them on the roas so soon there'll be lots of second-hand ones...), the CTS (same good old GM V6 engine block, but spoiled by the odd body styling), or the 75 V8 (too rare, will become a collectors item in 25 years but in the meantime will be very difficult obtaining second-hand bits for DIY repairs).

So maybe I'll just run the Omega to the ground... never did it with a car before, guess there's always a first time. So you'r all stuck with me for now  ;D

Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Phil

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 799
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #7 on: 08 January 2007, 12:56:51 »

Quote
Talking of the Monaro again, the right model for me would have been the back-to-its-roots Holden, now there's a proper Omega with V8 engine, but not for £50k...

Brand new HSV Commodore from Linden Specialist Vehicles, already imported in the country are comparable with the Monaro, around £35k, not sure if they have any at the min.

2nd hand a 2000 registered cars are now round 15k or cheaper.

The Rover is a good 'Q' car but i know what i'd rather invest in  :)

 

Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34010
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #8 on: 08 January 2007, 13:35:39 »

I wouldn't even consider the Rover....its got trouble written all over it.....

Very few made
Its a Rover...
About the only 75 varient with rear wheel drive so not proven on this setup.
Its a 75 so still feels like a country pub inside.
Its a Rover...

I hate to say it but, my next main car is likely to be a late Vectra C estate or a Signum or maybe a Saab estate......
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #9 on: 08 January 2007, 13:49:19 »

Quote
I wouldn't even consider the Rover....its got trouble written all over it.....

Very few made
Its a Rover...
About the only 75 varient with rear wheel drive so not proven on this setup.
Its a 75 so still feels like a country pub inside.
Its a Rover...

I hate to say it but, my next main car is likely to be a late Vectra C estate or a Signum or maybe a Saab estate......

Yes, but... but... it's [size=14]FWD![/size] :'(
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #10 on: 08 January 2007, 13:51:53 »

Quote
I wouldn't even consider the Rover....its got trouble written all over it.....

Very few made
Its a Rover...
About the only 75 varient with rear wheel drive so not proven on this setup.
Its a 75 so still feels like a country pub inside.
Its a Rover...

I hate to say it but, my next main car is likely to be a late Vectra C estate or a Signum or maybe a Saab estate......

The 75 chassis is based on a BMW chassis so should be better as correct wheel drive over wrong wheel drive.
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #11 on: 08 January 2007, 16:31:22 »

Quote
I wouldn't even consider the Rover....its got trouble written all over it.....

Very few made
Its a Rover...
About the only 75 varient with rear wheel drive so not proven on this setup.
Its a 75 so still feels like a country pub inside.
Its a Rover...

I hate to say it but, my next main car is likely to be a late Vectra C estate or a Signum or maybe a Saab estate......

You know it will be a Monaro  ;) :D
Logged

Big Rod

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Fife, Scotland
  • Posts: 845
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #12 on: 08 January 2007, 16:48:16 »

Quote
I wouldn't even consider the Rover....its got trouble written all over it.....

Very few made
Its a Rover...
About the only 75 varient with rear wheel drive so not proven on this setup.
Its a 75 so still feels like a country pub inside.
Its a Rover...

I hate to say it but, my next main car is likely to be a late Vectra C estate or a Signum or maybe a Saab estate......

There's a letter in Practical Performance Car this month from someone who worked at ProDrive when they were commissioned to develop th V8 75's.

Apparently, as is often the case, BL/Rover/Austin/whatever got obsessed with bean counting and effectively throttled the development cycle to almost negating it to the point that it's nowhere near the car it could quite easily have been.

The are attractive though! I mean, anything with a V8 in it raises my eyebrow! (And that's from someone who despises modern Rovers!!)
Logged
If I have to explain you won't understand!

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107022
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #13 on: 08 January 2007, 18:30:24 »

Quote
The 75 chassis is based on a BMW chassis so should be better as correct wheel drive over wrong wheel drive.
Its not, its a Rover chassis.  Its actually not too bad a chassis either. But its Rover, and nobody wants them, and with their downfall, spares may be an issue for some parts.  And build quality will be bad.

I own a Rover (25), and its not a bad car at all (compared to equivilent rivals).  Now I know some will disagree with me (won't you M_DTM ;)), but I think its a good car, great handling, let down by abysmal build quality.  We also had a Ford Focus 1.6 LX for a couple of years at the same time (same class car, similar engine) - the Rover easily out handled, out performed the Focus, and was much better on long journeys (despite apparent stiff suspension)...
Logged
Grumpy old man

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: ...who said there is no replacement for the Om
« Reply #14 on: 08 January 2007, 18:42:35 »

It used the BMW Z axle
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.