Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: royal family reforms  (Read 2077 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

portomega

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Port Talbot, S. Wales
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #15 on: 28 March 2009, 13:47:02 »

If this idea is about keeping Catholics happy and not offending them, then surely the next step would be to ban Bonfire night?
Logged

vauxmad

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Oswestry, Shropshire
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #16 on: 28 March 2009, 13:48:04 »

indeed as he says it could be an attempt to hide something else they have done.......
Logged

M0T0RVATE

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Orpington
  • Posts: 349
    • 94 Omega Elite Saloon 3L
    • View Profile
    • MOTORVATE STUDIO
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #17 on: 28 March 2009, 13:49:23 »

Quote
Quote
seroius question time.......We voted in blair in 97,so when he decided it was time to go,how come brown steps in? shouldnt there have been a general election? As you can see,politics isnt my strong point.

I didn't :)
As for banning St Georges day, just let them try >:( >:(
Religion= Pah. Can we have a smillie that spits ;D
[/highlight]


 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged

portomega

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Port Talbot, S. Wales
  • Posts: 313
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #18 on: 28 March 2009, 13:52:16 »

Quote
indeed as he says it could be an attempt to hide something else they have done.......

I think they might have sold all our livers to some illegal chinese organ farming ogranistation to help pay for the crap they've gotten us all into  :o
Logged

HolyCount

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #19 on: 28 March 2009, 14:05:16 »

Quote
Quote
1... I think he should leave tradition alone

2... Hasn't the government got more pressing issues it should be spending time, energy and money sorting out

3... if they don't concentrate on 2, 1 will be irelevant !!

if you read the last 2 paragraphs by andrew roberts i think it sums it up why hes brought this up now

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/5065063/Gordon-Browns-assault-on-the-traditions-of-the-monarchy-is-preposterous.html


Yes, traditionally, political parties have always used bad times -- when thoughts are elsewhere, to introduce possibly unpopular changes.
« Last Edit: 28 March 2009, 14:05:34 by HolyCount »
Logged

Richie London

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • heathrow
  • Posts: 10932
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #20 on: 28 March 2009, 18:26:48 »

god save king gordon of nottingham.
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #21 on: 28 March 2009, 18:30:10 »

I think there is more to this than meets the eye.As the Boy said the monarch is the head of the anglican church,if in the future a non Anglican is on the throne then the link between church/monarchy is broken,this would no longer be an Anglican country,so there would be no official religion and therefore a totally secular society,or perhaps another religion could become the official faith.perhaps one which had quite a lot of practising /devout followers ;)
The bishops would also lose their seats in the lords to be replaced by,probably another load of cronies/yes men.
In effect the countrys constitution would be torn up and thrown away.
« Last Edit: 28 March 2009, 19:02:13 by albitz »
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #22 on: 28 March 2009, 19:05:56 »

Why is Gormless trying to do this? could it be that he is trying to tempt the scottish catholics to come back to Labour and stop voting SNP?
May well not happen anyway,apparently the palace informed him that he has no right,it can only be done with the agreement of the heads of all commonwealth states as the monarch is not just monarch of the UK,but the whole commonwealth.
« Last Edit: 28 March 2009, 19:06:53 by albitz »
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #23 on: 28 March 2009, 19:33:46 »

Quote
Quote
I'm not interested in the religion side of this debate - thats a different can of worms - but how can the head of the Church of England be a Catholic. History tells us how much intolerance there is between Catholics and Prodestants...



If I am correct historically, the Church of England is originally the Catholic Church of England...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England

Something many people do not realise...

 :) :y

very true, i was being lazy and meaning papal catholics...
Logged
Grumpy old man

albitz

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #24 on: 28 March 2009, 20:51:44 »

Correct,The Catholic Church of England (Anglican)and the Roman Catholic Church are two completely different organisations.
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #25 on: 28 March 2009, 21:42:27 »

Anglicanism is an inbetween religion between Catholics and Protestants.

ie it has features of both.

eg alcohol is allowed, yet clergy can marry

So basically if you are classed as CofE you are Anglican and so neither but both of the above

Confused - I am
Logged

albitz

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #26 on: 28 March 2009, 22:16:25 »

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglicanism
Basically the church of England has over time expanded to other countries and is known internationally as the Anglican church,ie church of Scotland,church of Ireland etc,like the church of England but outside of England.
Logged

M0T0RVATE

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Orpington
  • Posts: 349
    • 94 Omega Elite Saloon 3L
    • View Profile
    • MOTORVATE STUDIO
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #27 on: 29 March 2009, 10:57:57 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
I'm not interested in the religion side of this debate - thats a different can of worms - but how can the head of the Church of England be a Catholic. History tells us how much intolerance there is between Catholics and Prodestants...



If I am correct historically, the Church of England is originally the Catholic Church of England...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_England

Something many people do not realise...

 :) :y

very true, i was being lazy and meaning papal catholics...

Wasnt criticising your post, just found thread interesting...

 :y :y
Logged

vauxmad

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Oswestry, Shropshire
  • Posts: 235
    • View Profile
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #28 on: 29 March 2009, 11:03:44 »

there seams to be a lot of refrences to wikipedia which is not really the most reliable source
Logged

HolyCount

  • Guest
Re: royal family reforms
« Reply #29 on: 29 March 2009, 12:45:36 »

Quote
there seams to be a lot of refrences to wikipedia which is not really the most reliable source

No, it's not -- but it is getting better! At the end of the day, though, we are talking papists, as in Roman Catholics.

My family was, and some of them still are, staunchly R.C and through and through Royalist at the same time. Both of which allegiances have cost them dearly over the centuries.

However, I still think GB should keep in nose out of our traditions and concentrate on getting us out of the mess he got us into  >:(
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.014 seconds with 17 queries.