Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sad news for flight sim fans.  (Read 513 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nickbat

  • Guest
Sad news for flight sim fans.
« on: 15 May 2009, 12:29:11 »

But why would any hacker want to do this to a hobby site?  >:(

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8049780.stm
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107124
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Sad news for flight sim fans.
« Reply #1 on: 15 May 2009, 12:35:37 »

Reading between the lines on that, I suspect it was probably a worm, rather than human attack.

To do some research a couple of years back, I set up a .asp website with no anti-sql injection protection, to see how long it would take the hackers.  Once it did get hit, which actually took a surprising amount of time (probably becuase it was non standard software), it obviously got on to a 'suckers' list somewhere, as now all that site does is collect data about hack techniques (that I use to protect my genuine sites), but went through a phase of getting hundreds of hack attempts a day.  I think it must now be off the suckers list, as not getting hit at all now...
Logged
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107124
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Sad news for flight sim fans.
« Reply #2 on: 15 May 2009, 12:36:21 »

And they got their just deserts for not having a backup strategy. Idiots.
Logged
Grumpy old man

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: Sad news for flight sim fans.
« Reply #3 on: 15 May 2009, 12:36:44 »

Seems like, on top of this (or is it connected?), a new UK "admin" swept up all the member information for spamming.

Dirty tricks and skullduggery in a hobby forum. Who'd have thought it?  :o

http://linux.myalbemarle.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=32&t=41&st=0&sk=t&sd=a
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: Sad news for flight sim fans.
« Reply #4 on: 15 May 2009, 12:39:28 »

Quote
And they got their just deserts for not having a backup strategy. Idiots.


They had a strategy....but not a good one:

"Yes, we dutifully backed up our servers every day. Unfortunately, we backed up the servers BETWEEN servers. That is, GREEN, our library server, would be backed up to PURPLE, our WEB/Forum server. That way, if one or the other failed, we would have a back up on the remaining active server. The hacker took out both servers, destroying our ability to use one or the other back up to remedy the situation."

 :o :o
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107124
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Sad news for flight sim fans.
« Reply #5 on: 15 May 2009, 12:44:36 »

Quote
Quote
And they got their just deserts for not having a backup strategy. Idiots.


They had a strategy....but not a good one:

"Yes, we dutifully backed up our servers every day. Unfortunately, we backed up the servers BETWEEN servers. That is, GREEN, our library server, would be backed up to PURPLE, our WEB/Forum server. That way, if one or the other failed, we would have a back up on the remaining active server. The hacker took out both servers, destroying our ability to use one or the other back up to remedy the situation."

 :o :o
Thats not a strategy, thats suicide.

Again, reading between the lines, they simply sync'd the 2. So when data corrupted/damaged, the shite gets replicated to other.

If they had any kind of strategy, they should be able to restore to a known good, just before it happened.  Possibly even able to do phorensics to discover how it happened, and plug the hole.
« Last Edit: 15 May 2009, 12:47:09 by TheBoy »
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 16 queries.