you're boring me Nickbat 
only joking - you're never dull i'll say that
would you have kids taught theres no such thing as climate change? wouldn't that be propaganda then? they're the generation that will be dealing with it, not us so it would seem to me the worst kind of hypocrisy if we don't teach our kids what we have learned whats the point of education?
now the overwhelming weight of science is behind climate change so do you go with the major accepted view or do you let a small bunch of cranks set the curriculum? what next evolution is a myth - lets teach creationism! 
flat earthers and scientology should get a look in too, surely 
would you have kids taught theres no such thing as climate change? wouldn't that be propaganda then? Children must be exposed to a wide range of subjects and there is no doubt that the change in the planets climate is worthy of attention.
I feel the problem here is that this particular subject is being approached from a judgemental - almost evangelical - viewpoint. It seems that deviators will not be tolerated and this appears to form part of the message being driven into impressionable minds. If that's not propaganda, I don’t know what is. Where is the balance and considered debate?
Inform, as part as a relevant curriculum by all means, but don't try and subsume the minds of children to hammer home the message, which in this case, isn't by any means clear. Is this propaganda acceptable in your view because it seems to gel with the current, if flawed, thinking? Everyone’s on board so it must be all right?
If that's the case children taught along these lines will never be able to think on an independent basis and will be inclined to look to officialdom for the answers they need. The net result of that is of course a populace totally dependent on the state to make decisions on their behalf, a populace incapable or afraid to challenge the accepted word. Look to recent history for examples of this.
now the overwhelming weight of science is behind climate change so do you go with the major accepted view There is a vast difference between theoretical and practical science. It does seem that the climate is experiencing change but the reasons for that change are by no means definitive.
I think it's fundamentally flawed thinking to base this change entirely on human activity and by extrapolation, believe that we as a race can alter this change by the narrow criteria presently being considered. How arrogant of some to believe that the planets atmospheric conditions and global temperature range can be altered at will.
That is flawed thinking in my view and it forms the basis of the propaganda presently being formulated for dissemination into the educational curriculum.
If that’s not worthy of concern, I don’t know what is.