Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Lizzie_Zoom]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental (Nickbats best friends! ) protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

[Field Marshal Dr. Opti]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

Are you suggesting............ that security is not all it should be .....Lizzie.

[waspy]

Guy Fawkes
It's a shame he failed, but maybe the next one will have more furtune

[Lizzie_Zoom]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

Are you suggesting............ that security is not all it should be .....Lizzie.

Well just say Optimist that if this was the USA and Congress involved, they would have been all shot before being able to mount the ladders!

[Mr Skrunts]

They probably had buckets and shammy's and said they were here to clean the windows.   

[HolyCount]

They probably had buckets and shammy's and said they were here to clean the windows.   

.....or the moat 

[Dishevelled Den]

They probably had buckets and shammy's and said they were here to clean the windows.   

.....or the moat 

  that's the one HC  8-)

[Dishevelled Den]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental (Nickbats best friends! ) protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

.....probably the result of having to consult a senior officer to authorise an intervention in the absence of a properly formulated risk assessment – I shouldn’t wonder

[PhilRich]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental (Nickbats best friends! ) protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

.....probably the result of having to consult a senior officer to authorise an intervention in the absence of a properly formulated risk assessment – I shouldn’t wonder

That's much more like the truth of it mate 

[Vamps]

The BBC have stated that up to 47 environmental (Nickbats best friends! ) protesters managed to get onto the roof of the Houses of Parliament today!

This is THE seat of British political power, and these protesters apparently walked past police with ladders, ropes, etc, and just got onto the roof.........as you do!!

Now, this is not the first time protests have been on, in, and around Parliament, but now it has happened yet again!

Am I being slow here, but don't we have an ongoing, long term, major terrorist threat going on, some / many of whom would love to blow up the Prime Minister (join the queue!!) and all heads of British democratic power???

But what happens, 47 protesters decide to get onto Parliament's roof, so just do!!

Bloody amazing and disgusting!!

If the authorities cannot protect the ultimate seat of British power, what hope is there for the rest of us??

.....probably the result of having to consult a senior officer to authorise an intervention in the absence of a properly formulated risk assessment – I shouldn’t wonder

That's much more like the truth of it mate 

They are arresting them as they come down, surly, if they were potential terrorists it would be a bit late......

[albitz]

They were probably invited. 
They dont worry about terrorists,potential or otherwise at Westminster.The bloke who planted the Brighton bomb to try to murder the whole cabinet in one hit has been invited in the next week or so.Im sure Norman Tebbit and his wife who was crippled by the bomb are overjoyed at this momentous event.

[Dishevelled Den]

They were probably invited. 
They dont worry about terrorists,potential or otherwise at Westminster.The bloke who planted the Brighton bomb to try to murder the whole cabinet in one hit has been invited in the next week or so.Im sure Norman Tebbit and his wife who was crippled by the bomb are overjoyed at this momentous event.

...he shoots and he scores

[Nickbat]

Desperation is setting in amongst the Greenies.

As I noted earlier in the week, the BBC has, for the first time, allowed a remark that "the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over."

Incidentally, that has really upset the chief censor on Wikipedia global warming matters (William M. Connolly..a Brit sadly) who states "I have Hank to "thank" for pointing me towards http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8299079.stm, which was presumably written to prove that the BBC is no longer sane or indeed terribly interested in reality." Yes, Wikipedia does have a full-time censor in these matters. Anything of a sceptical nature that is posted is immediately withdrawn. 

Even the Sunday Times apparently has story in its Section 4 (I don't get the paper or have a link), which contains the following:
"So not only is carbon dioxide plainly not poisonous, but changes in carbon dioxide levels don't necessarily mirror human activity. Nor does atmospheric carbon dioxide warm the earth: ice-cap evidence shows that over the past several hundred thousand years, carbon dioxide levels have risen after arise in temperature, not the other way around."

So the wheels are beginning to fall off this fraudulent bandwagon in the run-up to Copenhagen in December, where all industrialised nations are due to sign up to pay billions to developing countries in climate reparations.

Oh, and Mother Nature has been doing her bit too. Across the States, long-term cold weather records are being broken, right down as far as the Texas Panhandle.

In Europe, a cold blast is set to bring December-like weather down through central countries, as far as the Balkans in the next few days.

http://www.accuweather.com/news-story.asp?partner=rss&traveler=0&article=8

Still at least the SNP is bashing out the same old tired tune:

"The 2009 SNP Annual Conference will open with a call for other countries to follow Scotland’s lead and agree to ambitious plans to combat climate change at Copenhagen."

http://www.snp.org/node/15735
 
Way to go Mr Salmon! 

(Yes, I know that's not how you spell it, but there's something decidedly fishy about him  )

[Banjax]

Desperation is setting in amongst the Greenies.

As I noted earlier in the week, the BBC has, for the first time, allowed a remark that "the debate about what is causing global warming is far from over."

Incidentally, that has really upset the chief censor on Wikipedia global warming matters (William M. Connolly..a Brit sadly) who states "I have Hank to "thank" for pointing me towards http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8299079.stm, which was presumably written to prove that the BBC is no longer sane or indeed terribly interested in reality." Yes, Wikipedia does have a full-time censor in these matters. Anything of a sceptical nature that is posted is immediately withdrawn. 

Even the Sunday Times apparently has story in its Section 4 (I don't get the paper or have a link), which contains the following:
"So not only is carbon dioxide plainly not poisonous, but changes in carbon dioxide levels don't necessarily mirror human activity. Nor does atmospheric carbon dioxide warm the earth: ice-cap evidence shows that over the past several hundred thousand years, carbon dioxide levels have risen after arise in temperature, not the other way around."

So the wheels are beginning to fall off this fraudulent bandwagon in the run-up to Copenhagen in December, where all industrialised nations are due to sign up to pay billions to developing countries in climate reparations.

Oh, and Mother Nature has been doing her bit too. Across the States, long-term cold weather records are being broken, right down as far as the Texas Panhandle.

In Europe, a cold blast is set to bring December-like weather down through central countries, as far as the Balkans in the next few days.

http://www.accuweather.com/news-story.asp?partner=rss&traveler=0&article=8

Still at least the SNP is bashing out the same old tired tune:

"The 2009 SNP Annual Conference will open with a call for other countries to follow Scotland’s lead and agree to ambitious plans to combat climate change at Copenhagen."

http://www.snp.org/node/15735
 
Way to go Mr Salmon! 

(Yes, I know that's not how you spell it, but there's something decidedly fishy about him  )

on yersel the Big Yin

interesting article on there Nick, but i think you're reading what you want it to say, not what it says - climate change sceptics are quick to jump on anything that appears to strengthen their case and conveniently ignores hard scientific evidence - the earth is a cyclical entity cooling and warming all the time, the overall trend is an increase in temp but you take a square slice of data out of context and squish it into the round hole of the argument - not enough for me i'm afraid. 


the debate continues 

up next - we totally prove man didn't land on the moon......after these messages 

[Dishevelled Den]

on yersel the Big Yin

interesting article on there Nick, but i think you're reading what you want it to say, not what it says - climate change sceptics are quick to jump on anything that appears to strengthen their case and conveniently ignores hard scientific evidence - the earth is a cyclical entity cooling and warming all the time, the overall trend is an increase in temp but you take a square slice of data out of context and squish it into the round hole of the argument - not enough for me i'm afraid. 


the debate continues 

up next - we totally prove man didn't land on the moon......after these messages 

....I thought that was understood bj, so to what extent does recent human activity impinge on this entirely natural cycle?