Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  All   Go Down

Author Topic: "Climategate" scandal update  (Read 5529 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Brick Tamland

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Dublin
  • Posts: 444
  • Good one!
    • '98 2.5 Manual
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #30 on: 27 November 2009, 23:35:33 »

Clarkson on Jonathon Ross ATM, the audiance and Ross laughing at the prospect that AGW might be wrong  :( :( >:( >:(
Logged
Saving for one! All donations welcome, ask for details.

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #31 on: 27 November 2009, 23:57:29 »

Quote
Clarkson on Jonathon Ross ATM, the audiance and Ross laughing at the prospect that AGW might be wrong  :( :( >:( >:(

I caught the tail end of it. Clarkson is savvy. Ross is not. The audience? Given the lack of mainstream media coverage, they'll believe anything. (They probably know more about X-Factor than CO2).  ::) ::)
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #32 on: 28 November 2009, 10:32:21 »

So simple

We need some CO2 - however plants breath CO2.

So plant a lot of trees

Energy consumption is the real enemy - don't waste energy consumption trying to lower CO2 outputs, just make everything use as little energy as practically possible.

Build those nuclear power stations.

Pour vast amounts of money into fusion research.

Investigate wave power agin - no Severn barrage - will be an environmental disaster.

Encourage motorcycle usage.

Logged

Dishevelled Den

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12545
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #33 on: 28 November 2009, 11:09:18 »

Quote
Quote
Clarkson on Jonathon Ross ATM, the audiance and Ross laughing at the prospect that AGW might be wrong  :( :( >:( >:(

I caught the tail end of it. Clarkson is savvy. Ross is not. The audience? Given the lack of mainstream media coverage, they'll believe anything. (They probably know more about X-Factor than CO2).  ::) ::)



Ross and the BBC - need anything more be said? 

Who can justify watching this tripe masquerading as entertainment?

What a waste of bloody space!

Bah!!
Logged

Lizzie_Zoom

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #34 on: 28 November 2009, 14:00:58 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I watched a very informative BBC2 investigation into President Obama's aims on cutting US emissions and his attendance at the Copenhagen Conference.  Watch it in full to get the full flavour of the situation!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p69np/This_World_20092010_Can_Obama_Save_the_Planet/


Somehow I think the battle has only just started............!!!!!

 ;) ;) ;)

Only availbale in the UK :-/ Can you give give me the gist of it ;D ;D


Basically it explains how much of the American population are unconvinced by the global warming argument, with major industry (coal in particular) joining them in not agreeing with Obama's aims and wanting to carry on as before.  It shows how Obama has one hell of a fight on to convince his fellow Americans that global warming is really a concern, let alone for them!  Copenhagen will produce very little if the US fail to contribute as their President wants, and politically he looks like losing this one!;) ;) ;)


The BBC at its worst. Towing the party line: good bloke Obama against naughty Big Coal. >:(

Sorry, but this is pure propaganda, IMHO. :(

I'm surprised you rate it so much, Lizzie. :o :o

Did I say that Nick????!!! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

No, I just presented the situation as it is, from a neutral propective neither on one side or the other! ;) ;)

This reaction is one reason why I don't often comment on this issue on the OOF as it seem you get castigated for expressing an opinion that is contary to some very entrenched beliefs on here as Banjax has found amongst others!! ::) ::) ::) >:( >:(

Lighten up, and lets listen to ALL sides of a debate! ;) ;) ;) ;)

Nick, as you know I respect your views and personal detirmination on this subject, but you are in danger of over cooking this.  I certainly am not one to say "yes" to everything that is said just to please certain people, as history has proved that can be a highly dangerous stance to take! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
« Last Edit: 28 November 2009, 14:07:32 by Lizzie_Zoom »
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #35 on: 28 November 2009, 14:17:26 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I watched a very informative BBC2 investigation into President Obama's aims on cutting US emissions and his attendance at the Copenhagen Conference.  Watch it in full to get the full flavour of the situation!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p69np/This_World_20092010_Can_Obama_Save_the_Planet/


Somehow I think the battle has only just started............!!!!!

 ;) ;) ;)

Only availbale in the UK :-/ Can you give give me the gist of it ;D ;D


Basically it explains how much of the American population are unconvinced by the global warming argument, with major industry (coal in particular) joining them in not agreeing with Obama's aims and wanting to carry on as before.  It shows how Obama has one hell of a fight on to convince his fellow Americans that global warming is really a concern, let alone for them!  Copenhagen will produce very little if the US fail to contribute as their President wants, and politically he looks like losing this one!;) ;) ;)


The BBC at its worst. Towing the party line: good bloke Obama against naughty Big Coal. >:(

Sorry, but this is pure propaganda, IMHO. :(

I'm surprised you rate it so much, Lizzie. :o :o

Did I say that Nick????!!! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

No, I just presented the situation as it is, from a neutral propective neither on one side or the other! ;) ;)

This reaction is one reason why I don't often comment on this issue on the OOF as it seem you get castigated for expressing an opinion that is contary to some very entrenched beliefs on here as Banjax has found amongst others!! ::) ::) ::) >:( >:(

Lighten up, and lets listen to ALL sides of a debate! ;) ;) ;) ;)

Nick, as you know I respect your views and personal detirmination on this subject, but you are in danger of over cooking this.  I certainly am not one to say "yes" to everything that is said just to please certain people, as history has proved that can be a highly dangerous stance to take! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

I've spent ages and ages researching both sides of the debate and I have come to the conclusion that AGW is a scam. Job done, as far as I'm concerned.

If I was of the view that 2 + 2 is indisputably 4, why should I carry on listening to those who continue to claim the answer is 5?  ::) ::)
Logged

Dishevelled Den

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12545
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #36 on: 28 November 2009, 14:59:10 »

Quote

Did I say that Nick????!!! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

No, I just presented the situation as it is, from a neutral propective neither on one side or the other! ;) ;)

This reaction is one reason why I don't often comment on this issue on the OOF as it seem you get castigated for expressing an opinion that is contary to some very entrenched beliefs on here as Banjax has found amongst others!! ::) ::) ::) >:( >:(

Lighten up, and lets listen to ALL sides of a debate! ;) ;) ;) ;)

Nick, as you know I respect your views and personal detirmination on this subject, but you are in danger of over cooking this.  I certainly am not one to say "yes" to everything that is said just to please certain people, as history has proved that can be a highly dangerous stance to take! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

lets listen to ALL sides of a debate

...trouble is Ms Z as far as AGW is concerned not many who support the notion were prepared to listen, with any degree of seriousness, to any views expressed here other than those agreeing with their own and bj was, to my great dismay, at the forefront of that vanguard.
« Last Edit: 28 November 2009, 22:11:15 by Zulu77 »
Logged

sexydaz

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #37 on: 28 November 2009, 19:16:58 »

what the hell is all this about
Logged

Brick Tamland

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Dublin
  • Posts: 444
  • Good one!
    • '98 2.5 Manual
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #38 on: 28 November 2009, 21:47:20 »

Never mind ignoring it, but is it possible that the bbc could have known about it for a while in a complete cover up :o

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230943/Climate-change-scandal-BBC-expert-sent-cover-emails-month-public.html

I wonder what would have happened if the "news" media we are stuck with today had they encountered Woodward and Bernstein for their act of publishing lies about nice Mr. Nixon ::) 
Logged
Saving for one! All donations welcome, ask for details.

STMO999

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #39 on: 28 November 2009, 21:52:33 »

Quote
Never mind ignoring it, but is it possible that the bbc could have known about it for a while in a complete cover up :o

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1230943/Climate-change-scandal-BBC-expert-sent-cover-emails-month-public.html

I wonder what would have happened if the "news" media we are stuck with today had they encountered Woodward and Bernstein for their act of publishing lies about nice Mr. Nixon ::) 

Little Paul's BBC career is over I fear. He's my local weatherman and I shall miss him badly. ;D
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32569
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #40 on: 28 November 2009, 23:35:00 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I watched a very informative BBC2 investigation into President Obama's aims on cutting US emissions and his attendance at the Copenhagen Conference.  Watch it in full to get the full flavour of the situation!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p69np/This_World_20092010_Can_Obama_Save_the_Planet/


Somehow I think the battle has only just started............!!!!!

 ;) ;) ;)

Only availbale in the UK :-/ Can you give give me the gist of it ;D ;D


Basically it explains how much of the American population are unconvinced by the global warming argument, with major industry (coal in particular) joining them in not agreeing with Obama's aims and wanting to carry on as before.  It shows how Obama has one hell of a fight on to convince his fellow Americans that global warming is really a concern, let alone for them!  Copenhagen will produce very little if the US fail to contribute as their President wants, and politically he looks like losing this one!;) ;) ;)


The BBC at its worst. Towing the party line: good bloke Obama against naughty Big Coal. >:(

Sorry, but this is pure propaganda, IMHO. :(

I'm surprised you rate it so much, Lizzie. :o :o

Did I say that Nick????!!! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

No, I just presented the situation as it is, from a neutral propective neither on one side or the other! ;) ;)

This reaction is one reason why I don't often comment on this issue on the OOF as it seem you get castigated for expressing an opinion that is contary to some very entrenched beliefs on here as Banjax has found amongst others!! ::) ::) ::) >:( >:(

Lighten up, and lets listen to ALL sides of a debate! ;) ;) ;) ;)

Nick, as you know I respect your views and personal detirmination on this subject, but you are in danger of over cooking this.  I certainly am not one to say "yes" to everything that is said just to please certain people, as history has proved that can be a highly dangerous stance to take! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

I've spent ages and ages researching both sides of the debate and I have come to the conclusion that AGW is a scam. Job done, as far as I'm concerned.

If I was of the view that 2 + 2 is indisputably 4, why should I carry on listening to those who continue to claim the answer is 5?
  ::) ::)


I believe that my views on global warming are well documented on this forum......that it is real and unimagined.....and caused by modern man.
...........but I also freely admit .......that I could be wrong.....
.....Nickbat......... you seem 100% convinced that you are right......this concerns me ......as it can lead to apathy......a "we can do anything to the environment attitude"....because we know that the whole thing is a scam......and idiots like bannjaxx and Optimist are simply too thick to understand. :y :y :y
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #41 on: 28 November 2009, 23:50:18 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I watched a very informative BBC2 investigation into President Obama's aims on cutting US emissions and his attendance at the Copenhagen Conference.  Watch it in full to get the full flavour of the situation!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p69np/This_World_20092010_Can_Obama_Save_the_Planet/


Somehow I think the battle has only just started............!!!!!

 ;) ;) ;)

Only availbale in the UK :-/ Can you give give me the gist of it ;D ;D


Basically it explains how much of the American population are unconvinced by the global warming argument, with major industry (coal in particular) joining them in not agreeing with Obama's aims and wanting to carry on as before.  It shows how Obama has one hell of a fight on to convince his fellow Americans that global warming is really a concern, let alone for them!  Copenhagen will produce very little if the US fail to contribute as their President wants, and politically he looks like losing this one!;) ;) ;)


The BBC at its worst. Towing the party line: good bloke Obama against naughty Big Coal. >:(

Sorry, but this is pure propaganda, IMHO. :(

I'm surprised you rate it so much, Lizzie. :o :o

Did I say that Nick????!!! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

No, I just presented the situation as it is, from a neutral propective neither on one side or the other! ;) ;)

This reaction is one reason why I don't often comment on this issue on the OOF as it seem you get castigated for expressing an opinion that is contary to some very entrenched beliefs on here as Banjax has found amongst others!! ::) ::) ::) >:( >:(

Lighten up, and lets listen to ALL sides of a debate! ;) ;) ;) ;)

Nick, as you know I respect your views and personal detirmination on this subject, but you are in danger of over cooking this.  I certainly am not one to say "yes" to everything that is said just to please certain people, as history has proved that can be a highly dangerous stance to take! ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

I've spent ages and ages researching both sides of the debate and I have come to the conclusion that AGW is a scam. Job done, as far as I'm concerned.

If I was of the view that 2 + 2 is indisputably 4, why should I carry on listening to those who continue to claim the answer is 5?
  ::) ::)


I believe that my views on global warming are well documented on this forum......that it is real and unimagined.....and caused by modern man.
...........but I also freely admit .......that I could be wrong.....
.....Nickbat......... you seem 100% convinced that you are right......this concerns me ......as it can lead to apathy......a "we can do anything to the environment attitude"....because we know that the whole thing is a scam......and idiots like bannjaxx and Optimist are simply too thick to understand. :y :y :y

I have NEVER EVER expressed such views. My concern is that, specifically, the theory of CO2-driven anthropogenic global warming is a scam.

I have said countless times that I am of the David Bellamy school of environmentalism. The trillions that have been spent on this farce could have been better directed at provided clean drinking water for the millions of kids that die unnecessarily each year from preventable water-borne diseases, and protecting and enhancing the planet's biosphere.

Sometimes you make me quite cross, for you attempt to tarnish me as an insensitive, money grabbing capitalist that cares not one hoot about the environment.

As usual, you are mistaken.  >:( >:(    
Logged

Dishevelled Den

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 12545
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #42 on: 28 November 2009, 23:56:04 »

Quote


I believe that my views on global warming are well documented on this forum......that it is real and unimagined.....and caused by modern man.
...........but I also freely admit .......that I could be wrong.....
.....Nickbat......... you seem 100% convinced that you are right......this concerns me ......as it can lead to apathy......a "we can do anything to the environment attitude"....because we know that the whole thing is a scam......and idiots like bannjaxx and Optimist are simply too thick to understand. :y :y :y


....welcome words indeed Opti :y
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #43 on: 28 November 2009, 23:59:21 »

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece

FFS! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Logged

Brick Tamland

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Dublin
  • Posts: 444
  • Good one!
    • '98 2.5 Manual
    • View Profile
Re: "Climategate" scandal update
« Reply #44 on: 29 November 2009, 00:03:43 »

Quote
SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based.

It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6936328.ece

FFS! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(

It's currently 3 mins past 12 on the 29th. Please leave the refresh button alone ;D
Logged
Saving for one! All donations welcome, ask for details.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 16 queries.