Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[albitz]

Papers obtained under The Freedom of information act have thrown up a lot of evidence that the Government had a secret policy of allowing pretty much as much immigration as possible, largely for social reasons. Imo this story is not about wether or not you think that mass immigration was a good or a bad thing, but about the fact that a British government could make a decision as momentous as this,which would change the country in a major way for ever and at the same time deny the people who elected them the right to know what they were doing.
I know some will immediately throw their hands up at the fact that it is reported in the Mail, but it is reporting on documents which the government wanted to keep secret and had to be obtained under a FOIA request.
I can remember a few months ago this adviser chap stating in an interview that the mass immigration which took place in the last decade had been a deliberate policy decision which he had been privy to at the time, so this report kind of puts the flesh on the bones of his statement.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/index.html

[Nickbat]

Yes, this has now been exposed as a deliberate policy which, whatever one's views on immigration, should have been revealed as a party manifesto policy and then debated in Parliament.

Is it any doubt now that ZanuLabour have caused the huge disconnect between the political classes and the populace at large.

 

[Varche]

It wouldn't be the first time it opened its doors. Did the voters get a say last time? Methinks not.

On both occasions the country did very well out of it in terms of labour and the economy.

It is only now that the economy has collapsed ( and you all know which ******** banks I blame for that) that suddenly it is a problem. 

[albitz]

I strongly disagree, People have been complaining about this for several years now, nothing to do with the banking collapse.It was done to "mix things up" culturally and socially, but every time they were asked if this was the case they strongly denied it.
Its the most obvious case of Bliar/Brown/Mandelson/ Cambell etc,  assuming the British people were a bunch of half witted muppets I can remember.

[alfie]

It Will Be Soon a case of spot the white man.

[Entwood]

NuLabour have been doing this slowly for a long time, in many areas ..

There is now a huge sub-class of "citizens" (?) so reliant on state benefits for everything that their "vote" has, to all intent been bought.

And still the present bunch bring out new rules ....

It is now mandatory for a Magistrates Bench, on passing a financial penalty (fancy words for fine), to enquire if the guilty party is working or on benefits.... that bit makes sense .. if working they pay .. if on benefits it is deducted ... (at a whole £5 a week but thats another story .. )

HOWEVER .. if the guilty party is NOT working or claiming benefits .. then a mandatory ruling that they apply for benefits is made ... this is supposed to be so the fine can be paid by deductions ...  but in reality it ensures another person gets our money and becomes reliant on the state ....

And who will they vote for ?? the party that "might" reduce their benefit .. or the one that will increase it ??

In any society it would be called bribery.

 

[albitz]

One would be almost tempted to think that they hate "Britishness" and are hell bent on abolishing the concept a piece at a time.

[jerry]

Nothing surprises me anymore with this lot (not that the Tories would be any better mind).Just wtf were they thinking of-obviously not of the consequences of their actions thats for sure. Enforced multiculturism will never work, it never has. In fact it has the direct opposite effect to its intentions in that it worsens racial/cultural/religious tolerance. Most "modern" societies have come about through degrees of intergration and thats a very good thing. But it takes time and the end result is still a country that has its own national identity. You cant "force grow" it. If you take a cooking analogy, most dishes that use several ingediants you add over the course of cooking and you take your time with the process to achieve the best result and you end up with a (hopefully!) delicious and recognizable dish. You do not simply grab all the ingrediants, bung them in a pan and wack it on "high" for 10 minutes.