Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[tigers_gonads]

the only reason they never kicked off in 91 was because of my old mates on 2 sqn and the sas proved that they could find the scuds 
israel couldn't give a f*ck what the rest of the world thinks nowdays 
the latest stunt with the pasports is another example of that 
if iran gets nukes, israel will hit them hard
if iran uses nukes in retaliation then israel will turn iran into dust

then god knows where it will stop  :-/

[Kiksomass]

bring it on, give them a damn good spanking like last time. Actually good news for the Vulcan's, get them back in service again 

Buy shares in BAe and tuck them away in your personal pension portfolio.

We got very lucky the last time in the Falklands. Without the use of the Ascension Islands, etc etc

Hopefully our American buddies will let us use it again, no doubt they will if we offer them some of the oil 

Really must read Vulcan 607 again, i liked the discussions on the huge fuel RAF would need, US: how does a tanker with 7 million litres of fuel sound? UK: Brilliant, we will have 1 of those per week 

Ha ha, my petrol tanker only carries 42800. My boss would love me to carry that much!!

[Hannah Judes Dad]

bring it on, give them a damn good spanking like last time. Actually good news for the Vulcan's, get them back in service again 

Buy shares in BAe and tuck them away in your personal pension portfolio.

We got very lucky the last time in the Falklands. Without the use of the Ascension Islands, etc etc

Hopefully our American buddies will let us use it again, no doubt they will if we offer them some of the oil 

Really must read Vulcan 607 again, i liked the discussions on the huge fuel RAF would need, US: how does a tanker with 7 million litres of fuel sound? UK: Brilliant, we will have 1 of those per week 

Ha ha, my petrol tanker only carries 42800. My boss would love me to carry that much!!

I think they would have to have a new ADR category for that size of tanker !

[cem_devecioglu]

the only reason they never kicked off in 91 was because of my old mates on 2 sqn and the sas proved that they could find the scuds 
israel couldn't give a f*ck what the rest of the world thinks nowdays 
the latest stunt with the pasports is another example of that 
if iran gets nukes, israel will hit them hard
if iran uses nukes in retaliation then israel will turn iran into dust

then god knows where it will stop  :-/

hope that will never happen.. and actually I dont think iran will use nukes.. (I hate those mullahs by the way)
but to use nuke they must eat their brains in the breakfast..

however, its a big country and not similiar to iraq as so many political pieces..  and also will be hard to gulp for israel imho.. my estimation is; if it happens it will be limited to air force operation .. and also if it grows bigger, because of oil, some unexpected countries will involve.. :-/

[tigers_gonads]

the only reason they never kicked off in 91 was because of my old mates on 2 sqn and the sas proved that they could find the scuds 
israel couldn't give a f*ck what the rest of the world thinks nowdays 
the latest stunt with the pasports is another example of that 
if iran gets nukes, israel will hit them hard
if iran uses nukes in retaliation then israel will turn iran into dust

then god knows where it will stop  :-/

hope that will never happen.. and actually I dont think iran will use nukes.. (I hate those mullahs by the way)
but to use nuke they must eat their brains in the breakfast..

however, its a big country and not similiar to iraq as so many political pieces..  and also will be hard to gulp for israel imho.. my estimation is; if it happens it will be limited to air force operation .. and also if it grows bigger, because of oil, some unexpected countries will involve.. :-/

iran has one of the best ground based air defences networks on the planet so that will be very tough 
by the time russia has finished building it for them, even the so called stealth aircraft will struggle 


thats the wonderful thing about religon, it only takes one fanatic and  the right ingreadients and  ..................... boom 

[cem_devecioglu]

the only reason they never kicked off in 91 was because of my old mates on 2 sqn and the sas proved that they could find the scuds 
israel couldn't give a f*ck what the rest of the world thinks nowdays 
the latest stunt with the pasports is another example of that 
if iran gets nukes, israel will hit them hard
if iran uses nukes in retaliation then israel will turn iran into dust



then god knows where it will stop  :-/

hope that will never happen.. and actually I dont think iran will use nukes.. (I hate those mullahs by the way)
but to use nuke they must eat their brains in the breakfast..

however, its a big country and not similiar to iraq as so many political pieces..  and also will be hard to gulp for israel imho.. my estimation is; if it happens it will be limited to air force operation .. and also if it grows bigger, because of oil, some unexpected countries will involve.. :-/

iran has one of the best ground based air defences networks on the planet so that will be very tough 
by the time russia has finished building it for them, even the so called stealth aircraft will struggle 


thats the wonderful thing about religon, it only takes one fanatic and  the right ingreadients and  ..................... boom 

I also must note that we are buying gas from Iran also..and we wont be happy if somebody bombs those gas lines in the middle of winter

[mudflap]

I don't think we will go to war over the Falklands again - they will use diplomatic legal means through world pressure and claim a share of the oil profits. 

As for Taliban - they could lose a lot of support in Afghanistan as many of their "troops" integrate, but the hard core will move to other areas possibly in Africa and the battles will continue for many years yet. 


.

[cem_devecioglu]

I don't think we will go to war over the Falklands again - they will use diplomatic legal means through world pressure and claim a share of the oil profits. 

As for Taliban - they could lose a lot of support in Afghanistan as many of their "troops" integrate, but the hard core will move to other areas possibly in Africa and the battles will continue for many years yet. 


.

best bet is gas them

[tigers_gonads]

I don't think we will go to war over the Falklands again - they will use diplomatic legal means through world pressure and claim a share of the oil profits. 

As for Taliban - they could lose a lot of support in Afghanistan as many of their "troops" integrate, but the hard core will move to other areas possibly in Africa and the battles will continue for many years yet. 

.

yeman here we come 

[Nickbat]

US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Obama's no friend of ours. 

[Varche]

US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Obama's no friend of ours. 

The special relationship goes from strength to strength!

[Dishevelled Den]

US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Obama's no friend of ours. 

Obama's no friend of ours

I'm certainly not buying anything this man is selling.

[waspy]

Go to war over the Falklands, that's a laugh. Knowing how this government work, they'll give them away. They've given away everything else

[Dishevelled Den]

US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Obama's no friend of ours. 

You're quite correct Nick.

This relationship has always been a one way street - ask almost anyone connected with the Foreign Office or those who tried to have convicted terrorists - after their escape - returned here to lawful custody from their safe havens in the United States.

As I have said on many occasions we always were, and will remain, the streetwalkers of the US.

The following proposal holds a much more sinister intent than the so-called 'close relationship' being given for its creation.



Revealed: The new $1billion high-security U.S. London embassy... complete with moat

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1253378/Revealed-The-new-650m-high-security-US-London-embassy--complete-moat.html#ixzz0gY5Dzg7m

[tunnie]

US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece

Obama's no friend of ours. 

You're quite correct Nick.

This relationship has always been a one way street - ask almost anyone connected with the Foreign Office or those who tried to have convicted terrorists - after their escape - returned here to lawful custody from their safe havens in the United States.

As I have said on many occasions we always were, and will remain, the streetwalkers of the US.

The following proposal holds a much more sinister intent than the so-called 'close relationship' being given for its creation.



Revealed: The new $1billion high-security U.S. London embassy... complete with moat

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1253378/Revealed-The-new-650m-high-security-US-London-embassy--complete-moat.html#ixzz0gY5Dzg7m

Interesting reading the comments on that artical, quite interesting point raised that the US are neither backing nor condeming what we are doing.

Think if another country was doing what we were doing, might be more of an out-cry from the US.

Without any long-range bombers, and if they don't let us use Ascension Island, we are stuffed