hmmm - a bit heavy for Friday afternoon - but for example coltan is a mineral used in mobile phones. Because of its value people in Rwanda and Congo fight over it.
Is this source of revenue, which should be good for the economy of those countries, to be banned because it causes conflict? Or the companies that buy it criticised for not having measures in place as to guarantees that it has not been purchased from rebels etc? Or should it not be for the UN to act decisively to sort out such messes with vast amounts of human suffering and civil war.
Belgium is always pushing to make companies responsible for doing the job of governments and threatening bans etc. My point was that whilst some of us do understand the situations reasonably well - we are not backed up by say UK civil servants who tend to jump on the anti business bandwagon to avoid criticsm of government's standing by and watching the atrocities unfold.
Not sure if that helps.