I am so glad I missed it. OK, I know its for a good cause (more on that later), but who really wants to watch a bunch of bloody amateurs? OK, they are 'celebraties' (almost), does that make it more entertaining? Why?
As to the good cause...
I am livid that the state funded BBC can do this. The size and monopoly of the BBC means this one gets promoted for weeks/months before, and because of its high profile, all the large companies choose it to support for their tax breaks charity work. At the expense of other, equally/more needy, charities. And its not like they cycle around other charities, its been 20yrs of this one.
Its wrong. Completely wrong.
Children in Need is not a charity I choose to support, but even if the BBC dumped Children in Need and replaced with one of the charities I do choose to support, my beef would remain - the BBC is too influencial.