Because his messages were also valid to the majority of the audiences to whom they were addressed, therefore they (messages) too 'had to be heard'
A difference is, that despite the content he was an outstanding orator which is not the case with Farage
Extremism of all shades is to be abhored in my view whether political, religious or any other
In the overall sense Hitler’s message had to be heard - in no mean part because of the fear and intimidation that was also evident during a time of great upheaval, not necessarily because his assertions held any great validity to the well-being of the nation.
Tied to the national trait of generally doing what one's told by falling into line behind a strong leadership then perhaps Hitler was playing to an audience of ‘willing’ listeners many of whom had to hear his message as it was the only one to be heard.
I don't really think that the general thrust of the message being disseminated by Farage can be described as extremist at all - especially when compared to those contained within Hitler's oratory.
The only link between Hitler and Farage Zulu is that both are preaching that their country's folk / people are suffering from a great injustice.
With Hitler he meant from the Versailles Treaty, the German political elite, Jews and communists.
With Farage it is from the EU, its political elite, its Eurocrats, its financiers, and the people of Europe.
