What all the proponents of wind and tidal power are missing brushing under the carpet is that energy supply that varies with the wind and tides isn't actually much use to our national grid as it stands today. It just promotes less efficient use of the fossil fuels that have to be on standby for when the wind stops blowing.
Until we can dump non-critical loads from the grid during peak periods and/or store more energy between peaks unpredictable renewable energy is a chocolate fireguard.
A workable "smart grid" is a precursor to any of these schemes, hence the need for more nuclear ASAP.
Kevin
We can. A recent program on Scotland's use of water power showed several pumped storage systems in current use. I believe the french system can hold back the water until needed. And regards cost it has paid back its constructional costs and is cheaper than nuclear (1.8c per kWh, versus 2.5c per kWh for nuclear).
I'm not saying we chould immediately put a windmill in everybody's back garden, I think we should have a mix of different technologies, so we are not reliant on any one, and can choose which to develop. That way we can take advantage of any new technologies as they come along. I know windmills are fairly ugly things, but Salter's duck has the advantage of cutting down the waves to size which I am sure could be put to good use in various places around our coastline.
The more development we have in this country the less dependent we are on foreign suppliers who often have alterior motives for the things they do. A strong electrical generation research program would help to halt the decline in UK engineering.
Ken