If we don't get a sensible energy secretary sometime soon, pylons will be the least of our worries.
About time he withdrew his head from his 'arris and tackled the real issues rather than gimmicks like this.

Blast. Wait a minute build the new power stations in peoples back yards and near conurbations and not in remote rural areas or worse out at sea?
You have to build power stations where the considerable natural resources they require are located, even more so if you're going to use "renewables". You also have to connect them country-wide in a grid if you want secure power, again, especially so if you are going to use more "renewables".
So how do birds get electrocuted then?
Words fail me.

All I can say is that if birds are getting that big I'm not going to walk under any pylons in future.
I suspect the reason that pylon design has been unchanged for so long is that the present structures are pretty much optimal and have been designed (by en-gineers

) to give maximum strength and stability from minimum material, which is actually what you want from both a cost perspective
and to minimise their visual impact, surely? I fail to see how giving them to an artist to re-design will help matters.

Kevin