Eh? Wha?

I'm basing my views, on my experience. The Bombardier built 168's that I used for several years commuting to London.
Compared to the earlier BR designed & built units they were terrible, horrid vibration throughout the cabin, trim vibrating badly, not exactly quick either. Ride, well not exactly great, in fact in was not better than the BR 165's
BR units, although slower top end, where much quieter in the cabin, Chiltern added A/C and you could here no bits of trim about to fall off!
Secondly the new Underground units, there was nothing wrong with the 1973 Metro stock, was the most reliable on whole of London Underground!
They appear to create a massive amount of heat, unlike GEC Central Line / Jubilee line.
In contrast the Siemens units which run Heathrow Connect near me, feel sold to be in, nothing rattles, damn fast pulling away, aircon that really works. Unlike Bombardiers which is just appalling!
South West Trains into Waterloo from Sky are great too, again Leccy 3rd rail, fast, not that comfy but its designed for capacity. Airon that really does make you cold!! Even when train is packed. Ultra smooth too.
Moving on to Class 220 which I used a few times as Virgin Voyager services, I can't begin to describe how utter crap they are! Tiny cabin for main line, again really terrible vibration throughout the cabins, trim vibrating, small windows, weak aircon, although when pushed did have some go in them. But that could not make up for the very unpleasant passenger experience.
I don't know much about the technical sides of the contract, but from passenger view, I'm glad its Siemens, they make the better product

Why do I have an Omega, rather than Rover 75
