Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Andy B]

Some people don't do themselves any favours, not only was he stopped while on the phone, but finished his conversation before he's speak to the traffic coppers

............... and he wasn't insured either! 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026304/David-Secker-34-banned-road-driving-using-TWO-mobile-phones.html

[Richie London]

Some people don't do themselves any favours, not only was he stopped while on the phone, but finished his conversation before he's speak to the traffic coppers

............... and he wasn't insured either! 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026304/David-Secker-34-banned-road-driving-using-TWO-mobile-phones.html

and this man as well

http://thewestlondoner.wordpress.com/2011/08/16/drunk-driver-jailed-for-7-years/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook

 

[YZ250]

Some people don't do themselves any favours, not only was he stopped while on the phone, but finished his conversation before he's speak to the traffic coppers

............... and he wasn't insured either! 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2026304/David-Secker-34-banned-road-driving-using-TWO-mobile-phones.html

Who said men can't multi-task.   

[Shelby]

But he denied that he was using the second phone to send a text message and claimed that he was reading a telephone number off  it to give to the person he was  talking to.

Oh, thats OK then!  Some people just don't have the brains they were born with.

Magistrates said they would have fined him £500 for the offences, but reduced the fine to £150 after hearing that he was on benefits.

So what, just give him a bit longer to pay it 

[Plomien]

But he denied that he was using the second phone to send a text message and claimed that he was reading a telephone number off  it to give to the person he was  talking to.

Oh, thats OK then!  Some people just don't have the brains they were born with.

Magistrates said they would have fined him £500 for the offences, but reduced the fine to £150 after hearing that he was on benefits.

So what, just give him a bit longer to pay it 

problem is its still the tax payer who is paying for his idiocy

[Shelby]

But he denied that he was using the second phone to send a text message and claimed that he was reading a telephone number off  it to give to the person he was  talking to.

Oh, thats OK then!  Some people just don't have the brains they were born with.

Magistrates said they would have fined him £500 for the offences, but reduced the fine to £150 after hearing that he was on benefits.

So what, just give him a bit longer to pay it 

problem is its still the tax payer who is paying for his idiocy

Very true.

[Olympia5776]

I watched a programme on Monday night ,I think it was called " Coppers " ? anyway ,it was about Traffic Police in Cambs and it was a bit more harrowing than the normal police programmes.
In particular it showed the aftermath of a van running into the back of a caravan /people carrier which resulted in the deaths of two of the occupents .
There was film footage of the PC's going about their business at the scene and it showed the bodies clearly amongst the carnage .
The officer made a very worthy remark which was " people think being fined for using a mobile phone is a waste of police time and unnecessary but this is what it does...."
It made me think.