Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: m.o.t  (Read 3275 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36392
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #15 on: 19 November 2009, 13:53:25 »

Quote
Quote
Perhaps, but I'm not so sure that many don't prioritise other things like holidays and clothes above keeping the car safe.
For most, the mechanical condition of the vehicle won't enter in to it unless it starts making noises.....and even then the mechanically illiterate will ignore it if it doesn't sound dangerous enough (which is standard human nature).

This is very true. Even for those who should know better it's easy to be less thorough, or to put off "non urgent" jobs.

I was chatting with the MOT tester I use about how I am quite prone to missing faults on a car through not being methodical enough about checking it, yet don't tend to miss many faults on a glider before flying.

Turns out he's an ex-microlight pilot and knew exactly what I meant.

If you know you really are going to be royally breaked if something goes wrong, with no prospect of "pulling over" and effecting a repair, it doesn't half make a difference. ;D

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

cruisetopoland

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • UK
  • Posts: 1290
    • View Profile
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #16 on: 19 November 2009, 14:02:17 »

Quote
Quote
Perhaps, but I'm not so sure that many don't prioritise other things like holidays and clothes above keeping the car safe.
For most, the mechanical condition of the vehicle won't enter in to it unless it starts making noises.....and even then the mechanically illiterate will ignore it if it doesn't sound dangerous enough (which is standard human nature).

With many, you're probably right-but people should take responsibility for their own cars.

What about headlight bulbs?  How many cars do you see with more than one light out-that they KNOW about-it only costs pounds to sort, but is never a priority compared to everything else in their life.
My colleague has two lights out on his 2007 Audi, has money to burn, but just can't be bothered-even thought it advises him on the dash display every time he starts the car. The first (rear brake light) went out spring 2008...but no MOT to worry about until 2010.

Thank God for the MOT.
Logged

cruisetopoland

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • UK
  • Posts: 1290
    • View Profile
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #17 on: 19 November 2009, 14:06:49 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Perhaps, but I'm not so sure that many don't prioritise other things like holidays and clothes above keeping the car safe.
For most, the mechanical condition of the vehicle won't enter in to it unless it starts making noises.....and even then the mechanically illiterate will ignore it if it doesn't sound dangerous enough (which is standard human nature).

This is very true. Even for those who should know better it's easy to be less thorough, or to put off "non urgent" jobs.

I was chatting with the MOT tester I use about how I am quite prone to missing faults on a car through not being methodical enough about checking it, yet don't tend to miss many faults on a glider before flying.

Turns out he's an ex-microlight pilot and knew exactly what I meant.

If you know you really are going to be royally breaked if something goes wrong, with no prospect of "pulling over" and effecting a repair, it doesn't half make a difference. ;D

Kevin

I suppose my diligence comes from relying totally on my machine for long tours and not wanting it to ever break down-plus the fact as a coach driver I had to check the vehicle every day before setting off and "defect" it if there was anything up-even a minor bulb.

As you say, people take the easiest way-I always try to prevent a breakdown or issue and see the extra effort as less effort in the long run (like you avaitors!).  :y
Logged

KillerWatt

  • Guest
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #18 on: 19 November 2009, 20:23:34 »

Quote
With many, you're probably right-but people should take responsibility for their own cars.
The law has said for years that the driver is responsible for ensuring roadworthiness, but how often do you think that particular law is enforced?


Quote
What about headlight bulbs?  How many cars do you see with more than one light out-that they KNOW about-it only costs pounds to sort, but is never a priority compared to everything else in their life.
To be honest, I'm not bothered if a light is out on a vehicle I see. The way I see it is this......if I've noticed the missing light, then I've noticed the vehicle, and plan accordingly.

Quote
My colleague has two lights out on his 2007 Audi, has money to burn, but just can't be bothered-even thought it advises him on the dash display every time he starts the car. The first (rear brake light) went out spring 2008...but no MOT to worry about until 2010.
Your colleague sounds very much to me like the arrogant rich c**t who thinks he owns the road.
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #19 on: 19 November 2009, 21:30:39 »

Short trip into town.

Saw about 20 in the mile on the road I counted

3 one headlamp out
1 no headlamp
Logged

Welung666

  • Guest
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #20 on: 19 November 2009, 21:34:31 »

I have a friend who is a traffic officer in our local force. He's a right git for issuing 'inappropriate lighting' tickets for fog light use when not foggy and U/S lights on vehicles. Being an ex-trucker I still check my oil/water/lights daily before I even pull off. My neighbours (well the ones I talk to) all think I'm bonkers ;D ;D
« Last Edit: 19 November 2009, 21:36:02 by Welung666 »
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36392
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #21 on: 19 November 2009, 23:27:58 »

Quote
I have a friend who is a traffic officer in our local force. He's a right git for issuing 'inappropriate lighting' tickets for fog light use when not foggy and U/S lights on vehicles. Being an ex-trucker I still check my oil/water/lights daily before I even pull off. My neighbours (well the ones I talk to) all think I'm bonkers ;D ;D

Send him to Hampshire. About one in 5 cars on my commute are cretins who drive with fog lights on in all weathers. >:(

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: m.o.t
« Reply #22 on: 19 November 2009, 23:49:13 »

Quote
Quote
Perhaps, but I'm not so sure that many don't prioritise other things like holidays and clothes above keeping the car safe.
For most, the mechanical condition of the vehicle won't enter in to it unless it starts making noises.....and even then the mechanically illiterate will ignore it if it doesn't sound dangerous enough (which is standard human nature).

I am ashamed to say that Master Vamp's car failed its MOT, well it didn't cos I said fix it, but I was surprised at how much was wrong with it. I only bought it in June and it drives fine, so I thought, but needed loads doing around the brakes etc.... ::) :-[ ::)
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 18 queries.