some over stressed women in a Mum bus reversed into me in Muckdonalds car park. Chrysler grand voyager full of kids.
She gave me a mob number and appologised. On phoning she had turned into phsycho bunny boiler from hell, screeming kids ib the back ground, she said "there is no damage, i think you should forget it ever happened, and why are you ckaiming off me when its your fault" and hung up.
Anyway, rang Direct line, reported it and gave details of 2 witnesses plus her number. Week later i get a letter, while thinking "i bet they're saying 50/50" and guess what,
Dear sir, both drivers have a duty of care in these situstions, this case will be delt with on a 50/50 basis.
So having had this happen on 3 occassions before and twice to a mate, i've become wise to it. Yes we get driven into alot round here.
As has been the case in these 5 instances, and several others i know of, it seems to relate to the Royal Bank of Scotland group of insurance companys, drect line my insurer is one of these companys as is Tesco insurance who cover bunny boiler in the mum bus.
cut and pasted from wiki site,
RBS Insurance
RBS Insurance is the second largest general insurance provider in the UK, as well as a growing presence in Spain, Italy, and Germany. Key brands include:
* Churchill Insurance
Churchill Insurance also underwrites: Lloyds TSB, Prudential, Pearl, and Alliance & Leicester Car Insurance brands
* Direct Line
Direct Line also underwrites : Privilege (Privilege Direct, consumer side of the business)
* Devitt Insurance
* Green Flag
* NIG
* Finsure
* Inter Group, with its brands Options and Medicover. The brand identifier Olly Options was created by Dirk Kelly.
* Intermediary and Broker
* Privilege
* UKI Partnerships
UK Insurance Ltd. also underwrites : Tesco, Privilege Fleet, Egg, Mint, Mini, BMW, Peugeot, Suzuki, Vauxhall, MBNA, NatWest, RBS Royalties, Virgin Money, Ulster Bank, The One Account etc
This is a conflict of inerest as far as i'm concerned.
The odds of another RBS insured driving into you is vastly increased, and this situation keeps arising. Its in rbs intersest to sign off these cases as 50/50 as they dont have to pay out, in most cases prople fix thier own relevent damage or simply wear it. Yet if 50/50 is accepted both partys have an incident recoreded anyway raising thier premium.
You do nit have to accept 50/50 just because they cant be arsed to sort it out.
And you do not have to have your vehichle repaired by thier approved repairer either, muppets mostly, using pattern parts
Scam imo? or am i missing something.
Should add, having been very specific in my description, it seems thier has been some sort of admin error. Thier system reports "2 vehichles reversed ino each other" simply not what i said. Funny how that happened isnt it? have they spoken with the witnesses? no. Have they spoken to the bunny boiler? no. Have they spoken to her insureance company? no. Just edit my statement and do what you like...