Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Engine differences and preferences  (Read 1176 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sixstring

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Lydney, Gloucestershire
  • Posts: 2127
  • Its just GOTTA be a big V6. Mmm....NOS........
    • View Profile
Engine differences and preferences
« on: 21 April 2010, 12:42:03 »

Ok, I have the X30Xe, and love it. What I need to know is:

Is the 3.2 a better engine, and is it just a bored-out 3.0?

Is the 3.2 cheaper to run, or the same?

Are parts harder to get hold of, and are some 3.0 parts interchangeable?

Can I put a 3.2 plenum/throttle tube setup on a 3.0 and is there any advantage?

Is a 3.2 a straight swap should my 3.0 fail?

Thanks All!!

Mike.  (p.s. nothing wrong with my 3.0, but would like a 3.2,  dislike the facelift and prefer the mini-facelift, so might change the engine, box, and diff)
Logged
Self confessed Electro-Mechanical nut, Guitarist/Singer and Motorcyclist. Drives an estate due to all the equipment he has to carry,Electrickery fiddler who loves Automatics and BIG Vee engines.

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #1 on: 21 April 2010, 12:46:53 »

Is 3.2 better? Well it uses coil per plug, which seem to be less reliable than dis packs so not really!

Its not cheaper to run, its no different.

Which parts? basically same engine so no different to 3.0

3.2 is DBW, so plenum set-up is different.

You would need to keep your plenum for non DBW bits, also 3.2 has no EGR and so on, so not sure if it would be straight swap
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #2 on: 21 April 2010, 12:49:21 »

3.2 have post and pre cat sensors.. and will be a   headache..

if you want more performance , there are some mods that can give better hp than the 3.2..

port polishing, head work, remap, custom exhaust manifold (wont be cheap) etc..
« Last Edit: 21 April 2010, 12:53:00 by cem_devecioglu »
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #3 on: 21 April 2010, 13:25:40 »

 ;D ;D

now seen your other post.. you already know what to do..

anyway I wouldnt go for 3.2 .. more complex engine..
Logged

Sixstring

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Lydney, Gloucestershire
  • Posts: 2127
  • Its just GOTTA be a big V6. Mmm....NOS........
    • View Profile
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #4 on: 21 April 2010, 13:32:09 »

Convinces me to improve 3.0 V6 not get a 3.2 V6 then.

IF, later on I get a newer estate, it will have to be a facelift-----will get a 3.0 again, then.

CHEERS ALL!!

Mike.
Logged
Self confessed Electro-Mechanical nut, Guitarist/Singer and Motorcyclist. Drives an estate due to all the equipment he has to carry,Electrickery fiddler who loves Automatics and BIG Vee engines.

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #5 on: 21 April 2010, 14:16:26 »

not sure there exists one for miggy but a high flow water pump and an external oil cooler would be my primary concern if I decide to mod v6..
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36417
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #6 on: 21 April 2010, 14:50:50 »

If you're talking about serious tuning, don't forget the fact that the 3.2 has a forged crankshaft whilst the 3.0's is cast. :y

Other than that, it's swings and roundabouts. No SAI, EGR, ICV to get in the way on a 3.2. Better exhaust manifolds, 200 cc more against a little less compression, COP ignition (less reliable than coil pack and leads? Maybe - undecided on that). ECU is flash based so less easy to chip and the required relocation of lambda sensors. Choose your weapon...

Kevin
« Last Edit: 21 April 2010, 14:51:25 by Kevin_Wood »
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Engine differences and preferences
« Reply #7 on: 22 April 2010, 19:37:23 »

Performance wise, nought between 3.0 and 3.2.  I reckon throttle response is better on 3.0l though.

I have no preference for either to be honest - 3.2 is easier to work on, but more expensive for bits.
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 17 queries.