Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite  (Read 2883 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ians

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Reading
  • Posts: 3394
    • View Profile
2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« on: 23 July 2007, 12:56:24 »

Aside from the powerplant , are there any differences to spec?

I have also got the impression on here that the 2.5 autobox is less robust than the 3.0.   Is that correct, or only an issue if you put a 2.5 box on a 3.0?

Never had an auto before so look forward to be enlightened :)

Cheers,

Ian
Logged

Jay w

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Plymouth/Poole
  • Posts: 4319
  • omega gone
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #1 on: 23 July 2007, 13:22:42 »

leather was standard on the 3.0, cost option on the 2.5's
Only other visual difference was that the 3.0 has dual tailpipe, 2.5 have singles


i believe the issue is with the 2.5TD engine on the R25 autobox, i haven't heard of many petrol ones chucking their teddy out of the pram
Logged

RonaldMcBurger

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #2 on: 23 July 2007, 13:25:02 »

2.5 is 170 BHP, 3.0 is 205 BHP. Specwise, they are the same, so a 2.5 elite has all the toys that a 3.0 does. Generally 3.0 elite has leather whereas the 2.5 it was an option.

Autobox. the 2.,5 elite was fitted with an AR25. The 3.0 with an AR35. The AR35 will outlast any AR25. NEVER put an AR25 on a 3.0 car, it will kill the box in a week or two.

The 2.5 Elite is a good spec car. Changing the box to an AR35 when it does pack up is a good move. At the same time, change the thrust washer as per sassanachs excellent guide.

HTH

edit. Must have been typing same time as JayW! ;D
« Last Edit: 23 July 2007, 13:26:23 by RonaldMcBurger »
Logged

ians

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Reading
  • Posts: 3394
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #3 on: 23 July 2007, 13:49:51 »

Thanks chaps - much appreciated.

What is estimated mileage lifespan on an AR25 box?  I'm looking at cars with about 120k on them - are they about to go pop?
Logged

Dazzler

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Haverhill, Suffolk
  • Posts: 4198
  • Drive it like you stole it......
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #4 on: 23 July 2007, 13:53:09 »

If the cars had a good life, driven nicely and motorway cruiseing then the AR25 will be fine. If its had a hard life and been boy racered then yes it will fail.
Logged
Big jobbies now finished.....Now running on LPG

RonaldMcBurger

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #5 on: 23 July 2007, 13:56:44 »

They can go on for ever. My wifes 2.5 CDX estate has 160k on it, original box and still going strong. In fact, the best I have driven out of all the 17 I have owned.

There is no rule of thumb as such because it will depend on traffic coditions and driving style, but 120k seems to be a theme for AR25s to fail on the tuirbo diesel engined ones, and around 150k on some others. They can just as easily fail at 70k, but these boxes are one of thes best around. main problems being that the ATF shoud be changed every 50k, vbut often gets skipped by. Also the thrust washer is platic, so they failed a lot.

When trying one of these, give it a drive for a good 5 miles plus to warm it up, then floor it. It should picjk up smoothly and kick down the gears. Changes up in sports mode will be at red line, but should be VERY smooth. Any thumping or 'neutral' moments are a warning sign!


EDIT: Unreal! Another co-typer! ;D
« Last Edit: 23 July 2007, 13:57:26 by RonaldMcBurger »
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #6 on: 23 July 2007, 14:06:37 »

Quote
They can go on for ever. My wifes 2.5 CDX estate has 160k on it, original box and still going strong. In fact, the best I have driven out of all the 17 I have owned.

There is no rule of thumb as such because it will depend on traffic coditions and driving style, but 120k seems to be a theme for AR25s to fail on the tuirbo diesel engined ones, and around 150k on some others. They can just as easily fail at 70k, but these boxes are one of thes best around. main problems being that the ATF shoud be changed every 50k, vbut often gets skipped by. Also the thrust washer is platic, so they failed a lot.

When trying one of these, give it a drive for a good 5 miles plus to warm it up, then floor it. It should picjk up smoothly and kick down the gears. Changes up in sports mode will be at red line, but should be VERY smooth. Any thumping or 'neutral' moments are a warning sign!


EDIT: Unreal! Another co-typer! ;D
Yup, the AR25 went on tractor at just under 121k (though LB66 reckoned it may not be original).  Replacement also went at just over 121k  :P
Logged
Grumpy old man

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39774
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #7 on: 23 July 2007, 14:53:02 »

Quote
......
Specwise, they are the same, so a 2.5 elite has all the toys that a 3.0 does.....

2.5 doesn't have sat nav as standard - 3.0 does.
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #8 on: 23 July 2007, 14:57:02 »

Quote
Quote
......
Specwise, they are the same, so a 2.5 elite has all the toys that a 3.0 does.....

2.5 doesn't have sat nav as standard - 3.0 does.
Only after 1998.
Logged
Grumpy old man

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39774
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #9 on: 23 July 2007, 21:32:32 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
......
Specwise, they are the same, so a 2.5 elite has all the toys that a 3.0 does.....

2.5 doesn't have sat nav as standard - 3.0 does.
Only after 1998.

That's what I meant!  ::)
Logged

Tony H

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4940
  • Black Elites are luurvley
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #10 on: 23 July 2007, 22:00:51 »

Can the AR25 and the AR35   auto boxes be identified by serial numbers or the like?
Logged
Be aware of mole holes be very aware!

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107023
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #11 on: 23 July 2007, 22:18:33 »

Quote
Can the AR25 and the AR35   auto boxes be identified by serial numbers or the like?
Easier to identify by the bloody great ID plate riveted to side... ::)
Logged
Grumpy old man

Tony H

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • liverpool
  • Posts: 4940
  • Black Elites are luurvley
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #12 on: 23 July 2007, 22:29:04 »

Quote
Quote
Can the AR25 and the AR35   auto boxes be identified by serial numbers or the like?
Easier to identify by the bloody great ID plate riveted to side... ::)
Which side? ;)
Logged
Be aware of mole holes be very aware!

ians

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Reading
  • Posts: 3394
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #13 on: 23 July 2007, 22:42:01 »

the outside I think

 ;D ;D ;D
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39774
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 vs 3.0 Elite
« Reply #14 on: 23 July 2007, 23:51:28 »

Quote
Quote
Can the AR25 and the AR35   auto boxes be identified by serial numbers or the like?
Easier to identify by the bloody great ID plate riveted to side... ::)

I wish there was  F17 on the side of my Astra box. Mr Haynes says there should be but .... there isn't. I can see where the sticky paper label used to be.  :(
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 16 queries.