Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 or 2.6  (Read 4163 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107026
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #15 on: 27 December 2008, 17:38:32 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
for me, 2.6 all day long. Pedal trick gives more accurate engine codes, no egr, no dis pac and leads(coil pac cylinder) drive by wire throttle. More refined sorted motor, will probably be newer/less miles. BUT, they do suffer with a pre cat problem which is of no real consequence other than the dash light on all the time, which may mask a more serious issue. Can be sorted by moving the lambda sensor, post cats, or something like that. Hth

Lol, I love these sorts of posts.

The engines(-2.5-26 and 3.0-3.2) are no different (the only major change was on the 3.2 which got a steel crank), slightly more cc on each but, lower compression ratio which was a shame.

The management system did change but, not by much, drive by wire throttle and coil per plug setup (less reliable).

The lower compresson ratio allowed for the removal of the EGR setup and the extra pre-cat supported removal of the air injection.

Given the above, it means there is jack all in it.......and to drive, if both are in good order, you cant tell the difference!
Oh yes, no secondary air gubbins to go wrong... and the 2.6 will come in a much better looking body shape, with a far better interior. Esp if in elite which wont have those nasty leather pleats in the door cards, ar whole a far better car... For me... :-)
Ahh, facelift, you mean that inferior quality on internal finishes ;D


As to engines, nothing between them from performance side, 2.6 has some expensive reliability issues around the expensive coil packs, and the throttle body.
Logged
Grumpy old man

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #16 on: 27 December 2008, 19:25:29 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
for me, 2.6 all day long. Pedal trick gives more accurate engine codes, no egr, no dis pac and leads(coil pac cylinder) drive by wire throttle. More refined sorted motor, will probably be newer/less miles. BUT, they do suffer with a pre cat problem which is of no real consequence other than the dash light on all the time, which may mask a more serious issue. Can be sorted by moving the lambda sensor, post cats, or something like that. Hth

Lol, I love these sorts of posts.

The engines(-2.5-26 and 3.0-3.2) are no different (the only major change was on the 3.2 which got a steel crank), slightly more cc on each but, lower compression ratio which was a shame.

The management system did change but, not by much, drive by wire throttle and coil per plug setup (less reliable).

The lower compresson ratio allowed for the removal of the EGR setup and the extra pre-cat supported removal of the air injection.

Given the above, it means there is jack all in it.......and to drive, if both are in good order, you cant tell the difference!
Oh yes, no secondary air gubbins to go wrong... and the 2.6 will come in a much better looking body shape, with a far better interior. Esp if in elite which wont have those nasty leather pleats in the door cards, ar whole a far better car... For me... :-)
Ahh, facelift, you mean that inferior quality on internal finishes ;D


As to engines, nothing between them from performance side, 2.6 has some expensive reliability issues around the expensive coil packs, and the throttle body.

And guess which shape they own... :-X ;) ;D

Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 107026
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #17 on: 27 December 2008, 20:00:50 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
for me, 2.6 all day long. Pedal trick gives more accurate engine codes, no egr, no dis pac and leads(coil pac cylinder) drive by wire throttle. More refined sorted motor, will probably be newer/less miles. BUT, they do suffer with a pre cat problem which is of no real consequence other than the dash light on all the time, which may mask a more serious issue. Can be sorted by moving the lambda sensor, post cats, or something like that. Hth

Lol, I love these sorts of posts.

The engines(-2.5-26 and 3.0-3.2) are no different (the only major change was on the 3.2 which got a steel crank), slightly more cc on each but, lower compression ratio which was a shame.

The management system did change but, not by much, drive by wire throttle and coil per plug setup (less reliable).

The lower compresson ratio allowed for the removal of the EGR setup and the extra pre-cat supported removal of the air injection.

Given the above, it means there is jack all in it.......and to drive, if both are in good order, you cant tell the difference!
Oh yes, no secondary air gubbins to go wrong... and the 2.6 will come in a much better looking body shape, with a far better interior. Esp if in elite which wont have those nasty leather pleats in the door cards, ar whole a far better car... For me... :-)
Ahh, facelift, you mean that inferior quality on internal finishes ;D


As to engines, nothing between them from performance side, 2.6 has some expensive reliability issues around the expensive coil packs, and the throttle body.

And guess which shape they own... :-X ;) ;D

I own prefacelifts for a reason ;)

Mr DTM, if he is a 'they', has one of each...
Logged
Grumpy old man

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #18 on: 27 December 2008, 20:10:19 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
for me, 2.6 all day long. Pedal trick gives more accurate engine codes, no egr, no dis pac and leads(coil pac cylinder) drive by wire throttle. More refined sorted motor, will probably be newer/less miles. BUT, they do suffer with a pre cat problem which is of no real consequence other than the dash light on all the time, which may mask a more serious issue. Can be sorted by moving the lambda sensor, post cats, or something like that. Hth

Lol, I love these sorts of posts.

The engines(-2.5-26 and 3.0-3.2) are no different (the only major change was on the 3.2 which got a steel crank), slightly more cc on each but, lower compression ratio which was a shame.

The management system did change but, not by much, drive by wire throttle and coil per plug setup (less reliable).

The lower compresson ratio allowed for the removal of the EGR setup and the extra pre-cat supported removal of the air injection.

Given the above, it means there is jack all in it.......and to drive, if both are in good order, you cant tell the difference!
Oh yes, no secondary air gubbins to go wrong... and the 2.6 will come in a much better looking body shape, with a far better interior. Esp if in elite which wont have those nasty leather pleats in the door cards, ar whole a far better car... For me... :-)
Ahh, facelift, you mean that inferior quality on internal finishes ;D


As to engines, nothing between them from performance side, 2.6 has some expensive reliability issues around the expensive coil packs, and the throttle body.

And guess which shape they own... :-X ;) ;D

I own prefacelifts for a reason ;)

Mr DTM, if he is a 'they', has one of each...
I give up.There's just no helping some people.  ::)
Logged

Christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 611
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #19 on: 27 December 2008, 20:32:50 »

ok im going to view the 2.5 pre face lift that was in my first link .

Will view this tues and try and drop him down, yes its slightly over priced but it looks stunning, just need to look around the engine, anywhere specific i should be looking?
Logged
Nope i dont doo Sheep!

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #20 on: 27 December 2008, 20:42:06 »

Supposed to be better rust proofing with the facelifts
Logged

Christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 611
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #21 on: 27 December 2008, 20:47:12 »

will have a solid look around the body work, do these things rot underneth in any specific areas?
Logged
Nope i dont doo Sheep!

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #22 on: 27 December 2008, 20:47:55 »

Quote
will have a solid look around the body work, do these things rot underneth in any specific areas?

Mainly just the doors
Logged

Christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 611
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #23 on: 27 December 2008, 20:50:37 »

Yes thats where i mainly see on pics, as its an autobox im guessing just looking out for the usual jumping in/out of gear and any Transmission noises, as i say i have worked on these many moons ago BUT the Forums and Enthusiasts always know best, any pointers guys to this?

http://search.autotrader.co.uk/es-uk/www/cars/images.action?R=200842321384220&channel=CARS&adcategory=&largeId=831551600
Logged
Nope i dont doo Sheep!

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #24 on: 27 December 2008, 21:53:40 »

well, it does'nt have the usual elbow shaped bubble in the centre arm rest.
Logged

Christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 611
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #25 on: 27 December 2008, 22:32:30 »

meaning not worn?

Did notice the light on the dash but one is i belice TC which comes on when engine is just started up i belive, and is the other sport mode?
« Last Edit: 27 December 2008, 22:33:50 by Christian »
Logged
Nope i dont doo Sheep!

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #26 on: 27 December 2008, 23:12:43 »

Quote
meaning not worn?

Did notice the light on the dash but one is i belice TC which comes on when engine is just started up i belive, and is the other sport mode?
Yes, not worn, or the driver does not lean on it much.
Laidy owner maybe. Or its been changed, does it match the miles?

The traction control light could be an issue. Press the tc button on the centre console. If the dash light does not go out could mean breaked abs ecu which runs speedo, abs, and tc. Can be recond. for about 100 afaik. Never had that issue tho. so maybe
Another member can better advise you. S light is sports mode, button on top of gear lever.
« Last Edit: 28 December 2008, 00:04:11 by chrisgixer »
Logged

CDX_Steve

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #27 on: 27 December 2008, 23:14:04 »

I think one is ABS, TC should go out very fast, you can see its up to a good temperature so it has not just started, the sport mode is further over to the right
Logged

Christian

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Shropshire
  • Posts: 611
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #28 on: 27 December 2008, 23:17:47 »

So this coul dbe an issue, tho its not stated in the add, neither is the mot or tax.

Put an offer of 1500 on this and the guy says yes, what do you think?

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160306524686&ssPageName=ADME:X:RTQ:GB:1123

Sorry to multi post as this link is also on my introduction Thread, feel free to move or delete which in inapropriate.
« Last Edit: 27 December 2008, 23:18:42 by Christian »
Logged
Nope i dont doo Sheep!

CDX_Steve

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 or 2.6
« Reply #29 on: 27 December 2008, 23:33:06 »

Looks nice enough
« Last Edit: 27 December 2008, 23:33:58 by CDX_Steve »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 21 queries.