Incident could well have been dealt with by way of a warning or an alternate but, in the opinion of those dealing (both Police and CPS) a court appearance was the preferred option. As a result, a conviction ensued as described. Such is the way things unfold.
Think on the following, similar but different....
Dealt with scenario where very nice elderly lady of extended years drove the wrong way along the busiest dual carriageway in the area at the back of 5pm on a Friday evening at her normal cruising speed of 30. She was in what was to her, the slow lane but was, unfortunately for those travelling in the correct direction, lane 2 or the 'fast' lane or 100 mph plus of a closing speed into a brick wall....
Fortunately we managed to stop/advise those entering the road of the approaching disaster and managed to remove the nice old dear without further incident - she passed two exits in the process of getting to the end of the road - but when asked why she did not leave when she realised her mistake, the answer was 'ye canny go up slip roads the wrong way, son!'.
She was in her 80's, not as sharp at the wheel as she once was and that a recurrence (at her own admission) a distinct possibility.
I dealt with the matter by way of notification to the Fiscal (Scots version of CPS) advising that voluntary surrender of her licence may be an accepted alternate to prosecution as she had otherwise been completely law abiding up to this time.
It was offered to the lady and accepted. Matter resolved without any recourse to a criminal conviction and probability of recurrence of endangerment removed.
Some may argue at curtailment of liberty etc but, in my own mind, was the preferred option to save tears in the future....