Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: BHP v PS  (Read 1042 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

STMO123

  • Guest
BHP v PS
« on: 08 January 2008, 14:48:13 »

My astra is 115PS (Yes, I know) ;D but on parkers is 113BHP. Can someone tell me why PS is quoted and what it actually means.

Ta.
Logged

Elite Pete

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Chester
  • Posts: 19580
  • My spider senses are tingling
    • Audi SQ5 GSX1400
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #1 on: 08 January 2008, 14:49:41 »

Piece of sh1t ;D
« Last Edit: 08 January 2008, 14:49:54 by Elite_Pete »
Logged
Retired

Elite Pete

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Chester
  • Posts: 19580
  • My spider senses are tingling
    • Audi SQ5 GSX1400
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #2 on: 08 January 2008, 14:52:18 »

Logged
Retired

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34012
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #3 on: 08 January 2008, 14:53:08 »

Bhp is imperial horse power (1Hp = 745W) and PS is metric horse power (1Hp = 735W)

To convert multiply the PS by 0.986
« Last Edit: 08 January 2008, 14:54:03 by Mark »
Logged

MikeDundee

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Costa Del Peckham
  • Posts: 9370
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #4 on: 08 January 2008, 14:53:46 »

Quote
Piece of sh1t ;D


Thats what I thought ;D ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #5 on: 08 January 2008, 14:54:31 »

Thanks Pete, that was quick :y

Piece of sh*t :(

Hope they cut your leccy off. :P
« Last Edit: 08 January 2008, 14:56:01 by STMO123 »
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34012
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #6 on: 08 January 2008, 14:56:31 »

I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34012
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #7 on: 08 January 2008, 14:57:49 »

Also note that Bhp = (torque x Revs)/5252
Logged

MikeDundee

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Costa Del Peckham
  • Posts: 9370
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #8 on: 08 January 2008, 14:58:43 »

Quote
I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.

Sounds like he has a decent engine then ::), just a pity about the car its in ;D ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #9 on: 08 January 2008, 14:59:59 »

Quote
I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.

My driving style is still more suited to a big car. Cant get used to having to rev up to pull away. The low down grunt os OK, but only upwards of 1200 revs, there is absolutely nothing below that.
Logged

MikeDundee

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Costa Del Peckham
  • Posts: 9370
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #10 on: 08 January 2008, 15:02:02 »

Quote
Quote
I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.

My driving style is still more suited to a big car. Cant get used to having to rev up to pull away. The low down grunt os OK, but only upwards of 1200 revs, there is absolutely nothing below that.


Well its only week one, so your on the countdown now, before the next change ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #11 on: 08 January 2008, 15:04:03 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.

My driving style is still more suited to a big car. Cant get used to having to rev up to pull away. The low down grunt os OK, but only upwards of 1200 revs, there is absolutely nothing below that.


Well its only week one, so your on the countdown now, before the next change ;D

SWMBO has given me strict instructions. She caught me looking at an omega on ebay last night, she did an improper shutdown ;D
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #12 on: 08 January 2008, 15:48:34 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I note you have the VVT engine then......been quite impressed with those, they retain decent low down grunt but are still good at the top.

My driving style is still more suited to a big car. Cant get used to having to rev up to pull away. The low down grunt os OK, but only upwards of 1200 revs, there is absolutely nothing below that.


Well its only week one, so your on the countdown now, before the next change ;D

SWMBO has given me strict instructions. She caught me looking at an omega on ebay last night, she did an improper shutdown ;D


dont resist , you want your meggy ;D
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #13 on: 08 January 2008, 15:49:49 »

New Astra is a nice car..But not a replacement for an Omega :y
Logged

Golfbuddy

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Cornwall
  • Posts: 4151
  • I'm On An Economy Drive
    • View Profile
Re: BHP v PS
« Reply #14 on: 08 January 2008, 15:57:31 »

Quote
Also note that Bhp = (torque x Revs)/5252

Obviously.  ::) :P :P :P
Logged
[size=24]        [/size][/b]
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.066 seconds with 17 queries.