Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !  (Read 2894 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #15 on: 03 February 2008, 12:01:33 »

Quote

Be aware that our Thames Valley friends are having a little crackdown, and one of the bridges near the Witney turn on your private road is a favourite hiding place...


 ;D
Logged

waspy

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #16 on: 03 February 2008, 12:08:59 »

Quote
I would agree with that - the 2.5 manual should get off the line quicker (manual and lower geared), but when the 3.0 starts to sing, its off.


Be aware that our Thames Valley friends are having a little crackdown, and one of the bridges near the Witney turn on your private road is a favourite hiding place...


I've had funny looks removing Omega bumpers on a campsite before as well.  People simply don't understand ;D

Some things never change, i lived that way for some years back in the early 80's & they would sit there then
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #17 on: 03 February 2008, 12:24:54 »

Quote
We need to get my AP22 performance meter out some time, James, and add a 3.2 auto and a Westfield to the 'stats. [smiley=evil.gif]

Kevin

How about a 2.6?
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #18 on: 03 February 2008, 12:27:40 »

Quote
Quote
I would agree with that - the 2.5 manual should get off the line quicker (manual and lower geared), but when the 3.0 starts to sing, its off.


Be aware that our Thames Valley friends are having a little crackdown, and one of the bridges near the Witney turn on your private road is a favourite hiding place...


I've had funny looks removing Omega bumpers on a campsite before as well.  People simply don't understand ;D

Some things never change, i lived that way for some years back in the early 80's & they would sit there then

I used to deliver from Gloucester to London down the A40 and I knew the road well, good in a loose 2.0 Carlton :-X

I met the user a few months later, he said it went like a rocket :o
Logged

VXL V6

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Warwickshire
  • Posts: 9875
    • 530D M Sport, Elite 3.2
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #19 on: 03 February 2008, 12:42:32 »

When James drove my car he didn't break the speed limit...... it spent more time going sideways than straight ahead!  ;D
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #20 on: 03 February 2008, 12:56:36 »

Quote
When James drove my car he didn't break the speed limit...... it spent more time going sideways than straight ahead!  ;D

I did no such thing ::) ;D ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #21 on: 03 February 2008, 13:26:06 »

Quote
Last night, Markie and I had the chance to test miggy against miggy on an empty dual carraigeway back from Oxford private road.

I was in my facelift 2.5 manual, he was in the 3.0 Auto Elite Estate.

We must have both been thinking the same thoughts at the lights... which miggy is quicker!

Well, to begin with the 3.0 got away a little quicker.. but I gave the 2.5 everything it had, and I definately had the leading edge. Grinning, I changed from 2nd to 3rd gear at just under the red line, and booted it in third.

Thinking "I'll leave it behind me".. the 3.0 suddently came effortlessly sailing past me  >:(

I kept pulling in 3rd gear to just under 90mph, and then gave up, 'cos the Elite was practically on the horizon, and it was obvious which car was quicker.

Bearing in mind that the 3.0 Estate doesn't yet have the multirams properly working!

The 2.5 is not slow, and is running very nicely, so there's obviously a big improvement between the two engines?


'dangle berries'. You cant drive lad :D

2.5i V6 24V CDX 4d 8.2 s 142 mph 167 bhp

3.0i V6 24V Elite 4d Auto 9.0 s 148 mph 207 bhp



http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/specs/Summary.aspx?model=985
« Last Edit: 03 February 2008, 13:28:57 by STMO123 »
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16640
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #22 on: 03 February 2008, 13:32:47 »

Quote

'dangle berries'. You cant drive lad :D


Shaddap, Astra Man ;D ;D
Logged

STMO123

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #23 on: 03 February 2008, 13:36:06 »

Quote
Quote

'dangle berries'. You cant drive lad :D


Shaddap, Astra Man ;D ;D


You wanna try getting off the line with a 1.6 sewing machine under the bonnet. :-[ :-[ :-[ ;D
Logged

omega3000elite

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Suffolk UK
  • Posts: 64
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #24 on: 03 February 2008, 13:38:48 »

The 3.0 auto is quick ......... but try a GSXR - o-60 in 3 secs , 0-100 in 6.5 !!!!!

Thats a better buzz ......... and better mpg !

 ;)
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #25 on: 03 February 2008, 14:12:18 »

Quote
There's no substitute for cubes ....  ;)


Or as the yanks say: 'There is no replacement for bigger displacement'...   ;D

said that I am happy with my 2.6  >:(
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34026
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #26 on: 03 February 2008, 14:32:34 »

The multiram will make bugger all difference under those conditions....as the engine will be permanently above the 4K rpm range it operates in.

Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #27 on: 03 February 2008, 15:30:21 »

Quote
Last night, Markie and I had the chance to test miggy against miggy on an empty dual carraigeway back from Oxford private road.

I was in my facelift 2.5 manual, he was in the 3.0 Auto Elite Estate.

We must have both been thinking the same thoughts at the lights... which miggy is quicker!

Well, to begin with the 3.0 got away a little quicker.. but I gave the 2.5 everything it had, and I definately had the leading edge. Grinning, I changed from 2nd to 3rd gear at just under the red line, and booted it in third.

Thinking "I'll leave it behind me".. the 3.0 suddently came effortlessly sailing past me  >:(

I kept pulling in 3rd gear to just under 90mph, and then gave up, 'cos the Elite was practically on the horizon, and it was obvious which car was quicker.

Bearing in mind that the 3.0 Estate doesn't yet have the multirams properly working!

The 2.5 is not slow, and is running very nicely, so there's obviously a big improvement between the two engines?


Even both cars had the same engine and gear ratios,

the difference in clutch,maf, oil,spark conditions and tire friction differences would lead to different timings in the long run..
« Last Edit: 03 February 2008, 15:31:17 by cem_devecioglu »
Logged

Markjay

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • London
  • Posts: 5417
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #28 on: 03 February 2008, 15:56:11 »

Quote
Quote
Last night, Markie and I had the chance to test miggy against miggy on an empty dual carraigeway back from Oxford private road.

I was in my facelift 2.5 manual, he was in the 3.0 Auto Elite Estate.

We must have both been thinking the same thoughts at the lights... which miggy is quicker!

Well, to begin with the 3.0 got away a little quicker.. but I gave the 2.5 everything it had, and I definately had the leading edge. Grinning, I changed from 2nd to 3rd gear at just under the red line, and booted it in third.

Thinking "I'll leave it behind me".. the 3.0 suddently came effortlessly sailing past me  >:(

I kept pulling in 3rd gear to just under 90mph, and then gave up, 'cos the Elite was practically on the horizon, and it was obvious which car was quicker.

Bearing in mind that the 3.0 Estate doesn't yet have the multirams properly working!

The 2.5 is not slow, and is running very nicely, so there's obviously a big improvement between the two engines?


Even both cars had the same engine and gear ratios,

the difference in clutch,maf, oil,spark conditions and tire friction differences would lead to different timings in the long run..

..2.5 manual gearbox and final drive has exact same ratios as the AR35? Somehow I doubt it....  ;)
Logged
Alas, no more Omegas....

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36422
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 manual against 3.0 auto - the test !
« Reply #29 on: 03 February 2008, 15:57:28 »

Quote
Quote
Last night, Markie and I had the chance to test miggy against miggy on an empty dual carraigeway back from Oxford private road.

I was in my facelift 2.5 manual, he was in the 3.0 Auto Elite Estate.

We must have both been thinking the same thoughts at the lights... which miggy is quicker!

Well, to begin with the 3.0 got away a little quicker.. but I gave the 2.5 everything it had, and I definately had the leading edge. Grinning, I changed from 2nd to 3rd gear at just under the red line, and booted it in third.

Thinking "I'll leave it behind me".. the 3.0 suddently came effortlessly sailing past me  >:(

I kept pulling in 3rd gear to just under 90mph, and then gave up, 'cos the Elite was practically on the horizon, and it was obvious which car was quicker.

Bearing in mind that the 3.0 Estate doesn't yet have the multirams properly working!

The 2.5 is not slow, and is running very nicely, so there's obviously a big improvement between the two engines?


'dangle berries'. You cant drive lad :D

2.5i V6 24V CDX 4d 8.2 s 142 mph 167 bhp

3.0i V6 24V Elite 4d Auto 9.0 s 148 mph 207 bhp



http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/specs/Summary.aspx?model=985

... but Parkers reckon the 3.2 MV6 gains 4 BHP by not having leather trim :-X

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/
Pages: 1 [2] 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.011 seconds with 17 queries.