A sensible approach and will ultimately be back dated to all installs in the course of time I am sure.
As I have already said, its madness to be offering such highly inflated prices for energy production and particulalrly one such as PV where the numbers barely added anyway.
What it should do is drive the efficiency of the cells further and the get the install costs down to offset and maybe they will be further developed to the point where they are half useful.
What it should do is drive the efficiency of the cells further and the get the install costs down to offset and maybe they will be further developed to the point where they are half useful.
One would hope so - but in the search for practical alternatives to burning oil and so on for energy use this hardly inspires confidence to those who wish to avail of those alternatives believing that it will be of benefit and provide a degree of energy security.
In my view it's a prime example of legislation enacted on the back of wide-boy tactics adopted by lobbyists and 'special advisors' who seem to be more interested in lining their own pockets rather than offering a well researched, well developed but above all else affordable means of generating energy.
It seems to me that the Westminster bubble-dwellers have failed to move cautiously in this field. They have allowed themselves to be panicked on their insane quest to cut carbon emissions in this vain effort to adopt the moral high ground within the world ranking charts of environmentally responsible nations.
All they have really achieved however is to have done us all up like kippers and blatantly, through this incompetence, placed many of our people firmly in the realms of fuel poverty.