Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[millwall]

no theres no pics

its going to potentially cost the NHS £158MILLION to replace these womans tits.



Not mine or your fault that due to their inital veiness that they now have a problem.

And yet the NHS (in wales at least) will not only get the corrupted tits out (i just about accept this on the NHS) but will then replace them with Made IN Britain Tits costing me and you money.

Fkin Scaandalous IMO - when there are Cancer patients refused particular drugs because they are too expensive.

[aaronjb]

There are reasons other than just vanity for breast implants on the NHS.. in fact I imagine most NHS implants would be reconstructive (eg. post mastectomy for cancer patients).

Last I heard, they were only replacing implants that were initially put in on the NHS - and I don't think vanity is a criteria the NHS used for giving people breast implants.. at least based on the fights women I know have had to have things like breast reductions where there were clear medical problems.

[millwall]

these were from private clinics  not done by nhs due to illness

[aaronjb]

I suppose that's different, then.. still, it's almost certainly much cheaper to do this than the potential cost of treating all these women for necrosis and the extensive reconstructive surgery they'd probably require should the silicone funbags rupture unknown..

[millwall]

french exploding titty bags exploding   certainly doesnt sound nice

[aaronjb]

french exploding titty bags exploding   certainly doesnt sound nice

Are we still talking about boobs, or Sarkozy?

[millwall]

french exploding titty bags exploding   certainly doesnt sound nice

Are we still talking about boobs, or Sarkozy?

well they are both tits

[cleggy]

If the NHS put them in for reconstructive surgery then the NHS should replace them

If they were done at a private clinic for purely cosmetic surgery then that clinic should remove or replace them.

If they need removal, and the clinic that did them is no longer operating then the NHS should remove them only for health reasons.

We should not have to stump up because some vain woman wanted augmentation. I find it funny with  plastic tits pointing with skyward when a woman is sun bathing topless, and they don't bounce properly when she runs.

[Varche]

I was going to do a new posting on this but suspected it would degenerate io a fairly base level.

For me it is quite simple. If the Clinics used cheap implants that have subsequently turned out to POTENTIALLY rupture and cause issues then they should correct the problem free of charge.

However the situation is clouded somewhat by the implants used being cleared by our own government health authorities.  What they didn't know is that the PIP French company used industrial grade silicon rather than medical grade so in the event of a rupture the issues woul;dn't be so bad........... I bet the French company has gone bust (sic) and so can't be sued.

40,000 women in Britain potentially affected.

Clinics are profit making establisments. Breast implants are BIG business. They are hardly likely to fall over themselves rushing forward to do free replacements with pukka quality jobs.

And why do women mostly have breast enlargements..................Men and damn marketing.

[millwall]

Any woman having them replaced at our expense should have to walk with them out so we can all enjoy them.

 

[albitz]

I cant see that they have implants to please men. Ive yet to meet a man who finds fake boobs remotely attractive.
Personally,I dont have a hell of a lot of sympathy for women who mutilate their natural bodies for reasons of misplaced vanity.
Goes without saying - women who have had reconstruction after surgery etc. is a different thing altogether.

[jaykay]

french exploding titty bags exploding   certainly doesnt sound nice

Are we still talking about boobs, or Sarkozy?

Can't stop laughin'''''

[aaronjb]

I cant see that they have implants to please men. Ive yet to meet a man who finds fake boobs remotely attractive.
Personally,I dont have a hell of a lot of sympathy for women who mutilate their natural bodies for reasons of misplaced vanity.
Goes without saying - women who have had reconstruction after surgery etc. is a different thing altogether.

My ex had 'em .. I couldn't even tell - and they were rather attractive..

[omegod]

I used to work in the theatres of a private clinic in the early 90's. We didn't use PIP implants but ALL procedures were done on the stereotypical glamour girls or tarty women in their late 40's / early 50's.

It was possible to get them done on the NHS if you could convince a psychologist that your tiny baps were causing you mental distress( not difficult ),as you can nose jobs etc. The NHS has a duty of care to replace any they have put in but private clinics are a whole different ballgame, they will have made a tiny profit from renting out a room and a theatre wereas the surgeon will have walked away with 75% of the total cost, circa £3k minimum for 90 mins work.it would not be unusual for them to clear £12k for a mornings work

You tend to find that these surgeons have at least one child with the same initial and prefer payment by cheque to" R Smith" and the money popped in little Ruperts building society account/trust fund or whatever. The surgeon would choose who supplied the implants probably due to MAJOR backhander and will not give a flying shit about the current situation.

I have seen the effects of a burst implant and it's pretty grisly with one woman losing most of the muscle in her chest/armpit..But....

Private op= your choice=your problem, we shouldn't pay for replacement

[Marks DTM Calib]

I was going to do a new posting on this but suspected it would degenerate io a fairly base level.

For me it is quite simple. If the Clinics used cheap implants that have subsequently turned out to POTENTIALLY rupture and cause issues then they should correct the problem free of charge.

However the situation is clouded somewhat by the implants used being cleared by our own government health authorities.  What they didn't know is that the PIP French company used industrial grade silicon rather than medical grade so in the event of a rupture the issues woul;dn't be so bad........... I bet the French company has gone bust (sic) and so can't be sued.

40,000 women in Britain potentially affected.

Clinics are profit making establisments. Breast implants are BIG business. They are hardly likely to fall over themselves rushing forward to do free replacements with pukka quality jobs.

And why do women mostly have breast enlargements..................Men and damn marketing.

Quite the contary, when approved they contained medical grade silicon but, the manufacturers made a change without having them re-approved.

Clearly negligence on the manufacturers part but sadly an issue that needs to be sorted.

Interestingly, the NHS very rarely used this brand (thankfuly).