Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MAF sensor failed again?  (Read 1002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Impact Pete

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Derby
  • Posts: 439
    • Elite V6 2.6 estate
    • View Profile
    • Custom Flightcase manufacture
MAF sensor failed again?
« on: 22 February 2012, 10:53:59 »

Didn't get a reply from cutting out topic but as explained there;

unplugged MAF started car and took it for a drive, no cutting out and it goes like a rocket also the mpg is normal.

plugged it back in and poor acceleration with the usual cutting out.

So I guess in looks like another new MAF in less than 8 months.

I was curious as people said the car would perform worse with the MAF unplugged but it does not it's better, does that mean a new working one will be even better?

I'm a little confused  ???
Logged
www.impactcls.co.uk - Flight Case Manufacture

swirl

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • ellesmere port cheshire
  • Posts: 11
    • vec-c/cor-c/cxtrike/cx500
    • View Profile
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #1 on: 22 February 2012, 11:06:50 »

did you use a genuine gm maf or aftermarket have you got a cone filter on or standard airbox  :o
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36414
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #2 on: 22 February 2012, 12:19:47 »

Yep, non-genuine MAFs are a false economy and often fail early. Oiled filters will hasten their demise unless oiled very sparingly (whereby they aren't that effective).

Might be worth a look at the live data to confirm but if it runs better without the MAF it sounds like the MAF is toast.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Impact Pete

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Derby
  • Posts: 439
    • Elite V6 2.6 estate
    • View Profile
    • Custom Flightcase manufacture
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #3 on: 22 February 2012, 12:27:39 »

Yep, non-genuine MAFs are a false economy and often fail early. Oiled filters will hasten their demise unless oiled very sparingly (whereby they aren't that effective).

Might be worth a look at the live data to confirm but if it runs better without the MAF it sounds like the MAF is toast.

Thank Kevin, bought the last one through vauxhall world parts it solved the problem of the EML last time but now it looks like another failure so have put a wanted in the parts section.
I knew it was a risk on the copy parts but at that point I was not sure if that was the problem last time.
I am surprised at how good a runner she is without it connected.
Why does it really need one if this is the case?
Logged
www.impactcls.co.uk - Flight Case Manufacture

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34004
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #4 on: 22 February 2012, 12:41:07 »

Yep, non-genuine MAFs are a false economy and often fail early. Oiled filters will hasten their demise unless oiled very sparingly (whereby they aren't that effective).

Might be worth a look at the live data to confirm but if it runs better without the MAF it sounds like the MAF is toast.

Thank Kevin, bought the last one through vauxhall world parts it solved the problem of the EML last time but now it looks like another failure so have put a wanted in the parts section.
I knew it was a risk on the copy parts but at that point I was not sure if that was the problem last time.
I am surprised at how good a runner she is without it connected.
Why does it really need one if this is the case?

On an injection pump based diesel they are used to stop overfueling and minimise smoke output.
Logged

Impact Pete

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Derby
  • Posts: 439
    • Elite V6 2.6 estate
    • View Profile
    • Custom Flightcase manufacture
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #5 on: 22 February 2012, 12:42:11 »

Yep, non-genuine MAFs are a false economy and often fail early. Oiled filters will hasten their demise unless oiled very sparingly (whereby they aren't that effective).

Might be worth a look at the live data to confirm but if it runs better without the MAF it sounds like the MAF is toast.

Thank Kevin, bought the last one through vauxhall world parts it solved the problem of the EML last time but now it looks like another failure so have put a wanted in the parts section.
I knew it was a risk on the copy parts but at that point I was not sure if that was the problem last time.
I am surprised at how good a runner she is without it connected.
Why does it really need one if this is the case?

On an injection pump based diesel they are used to stop overfueling and minimise smoke output.

What about my petrol one though?
I'm not thinking of not replacing I was just interested

Pete
Logged
www.impactcls.co.uk - Flight Case Manufacture

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36414
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: MAF sensor failed again?
« Reply #6 on: 22 February 2012, 12:43:47 »

Without a valid signal from the MAF the ECU will estimate air flow based on throttle position and engine RPM. It's not as accurate as the MAF but if the MAF output is really bad it can drive better. It would be better still with a decent MAF.
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 17 queries.