Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: cleggy on 21 February 2014, 13:43:59

Title: FFS
Post by: cleggy on 21 February 2014, 13:43:59
£300,000 a week. Nobody is worth that for playing a game RIDICULOUS. :(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 13:57:21
£300,000 a week. Nobody is worth that for playing a game RIDICULOUS. :(
i agree with you . but nothing will be done about it sadly :y
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 21 February 2014, 14:45:18
Who woke Cleggy up?
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: cleggy on 21 February 2014, 14:54:51
An overpaid Scouser with an IQ of minus 10. ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tigers_gonads on 21 February 2014, 15:04:38
An overpaid Scouser with an IQ of minus 10. ;D


That's most of them then  ;D ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tigers_gonads on 21 February 2014, 15:06:21
The real problem with this is that now the ugly granny shagger has got away with this, everybody else will want more money too  >:( >:(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Rog on 21 February 2014, 15:36:47
£300,000 a week. Nobody is worth that for playing a game RIDICULOUS. :(

£300k . . . .

£200k . . . .

£100k . . . .

Even £50k . . . .  a week is just plain stupid.

£50k is higher than the national average ANNUAL salary

Who causes this ?  . . . . the public, by paying to watch it.

 . . . . . . but then, I wouldn't say no, just for a few weeks . . .  ::)



Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Olympia5776 on 21 February 2014, 16:53:38
£300,000 a week. Nobody is worth that for playing a game RIDICULOUS. :(

Yeah , £300,000 a week for the next guaranteed 286 weeks .
But the entertainer only gets paid what the audience will pay , so well done Man U supporters .  ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 21 February 2014, 16:55:28
I don't go to match's nor do I subscribe to Sky, BT etc so I don't really care to be honest.  :)

However what I am happy about is that for kicking a bit of leather about Mr Rooney gets the pleasure of contributing approximately £7,321,312.64p to the exchequer!  ;D   This will leave him with the pittance of approximately £8,278,687.36p to live on and buy handbags and Ferrari's etc ::)  ;)

Remember, We're all in it together!!  :y
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Rog on 21 February 2014, 17:50:53

However what I am happy about is that for kicking a bit of leather about Mr Rooney gets the pleasure of contributing approximately £7,321,312.64p to the exchequer!  ;D   This will leave him with the pittance of approximately £8,278,687.36p to live on and buy handbags and Ferrari's etc ::)  ;)



Approximately ?

That looks pretty exact to me  ;D

Title: Re: FFS
Post by: cleggy on 21 February 2014, 18:12:10
I don't go to match's nor do I subscribe to Sky, BT etc so I don't really care to be honest.  :)

However what I am happy about is that for kicking a bit of leather about Mr Rooney gets the pleasure of contributing approximately £7,321,312.64p to the exchequer!  ;D   This will leave him with the pittance of approximately £8,278,687.36p to live on and buy handbags and Ferrari's etc ::)  ;)

Remember, We're all in it together!!  :y

Not when his accountants have filled in his personal tax return form, as opposed to his offshore companies and family trusts. >:(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 21 February 2014, 19:05:37
I don't go to match's nor do I subscribe to Sky, BT etc so I don't really care to be honest.  :)

However what I am happy about is that for kicking a bit of leather about Mr Rooney gets the pleasure of contributing approximately £7,321,312.64p to the exchequer!  ;D   This will leave him with the pittance of approximately £8,278,687.36p to live on and buy handbags and Ferrari's etc ::)  ;)

Remember, We're all in it together!!  :y

Not when his accountants have filled in his personal tax return form, as opposed to his offshore companies and family trusts. >:(
Medical expenses (hair transplant). Travel to and from work (60 gallons per day in his Bentley continental) leisure (granny shagging) essential monkey food (erm.....bananas)........all tax deductable.












iPad thinks deductable is deduct able.  ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 21 February 2014, 19:14:07
Seriously, I am quite disgusted by this and, although it won't make the slightest bit of difference, I am cancelling sky sports at the end of the football season. As I only have sky for sports, that means cancelling altogether.
It may seem like cutting my nose off to spite my face, but enough is enough. It's an obscene amount of money, esp in today's world and, although I will miss it for a while, I will feel better about myself.
Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Rog on 21 February 2014, 19:20:25

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: cleggy on 21 February 2014, 19:40:52
Seriously, I am quite disgusted by this and, although it won't make the slightest bit of difference, I am cancelling sky sports at the end of the football season. As I only have sky for sports, that means cancelling altogether.
It may seem like cutting my nose off to spite my face, but enough is enough. It's an obscene amount of money, esp in today's world and, although I will miss it for a while, I will feel better about myself.
Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

Good on you.  :y :y :y
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 21 February 2014, 19:51:32
Worth every penny. :)
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: BazaJT on 21 February 2014, 20:55:44
When I heard this on the news I actually thought I'd mis-heard the amount.Sadly I obviously hadn't.That is an outstandingly obscene amount of money for anyone to get,let alone a football player.After all in the final analysis[and I'll be upsetting some footy fans here]it is just a game!!Nothing life changing is going to happen because of it.having said that,if offered the chance to be paid that much how many of us would say "No thanks I think that's too much,I'll take less"?
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 21:19:58

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.
watch it tunnie will be on your back ;D ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 21:21:29
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 21 February 2014, 21:46:28
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
No, because 75,000 people pay year on year to watch him play every week.

Same with Messi, Ronaldo, Gerard, etc etc. NBA's Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Scotty Pippin. Golfs Tiger Woods, Rory Mclroy, Phil Mickelson. F1's Lewis Hamilton, Jensen  Button, Michael Schumacher god bless him.

Every single one worth more than you, me, and everyone here. Why? Everything is only ever worth what people will pay. Deal with it. ;)
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 22:05:39
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
No, because 75,000 people pay year on year to watch him play every week.

Same with Messi, Ronaldo, Gerard, etc etc. NBA's Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Scotty Pippin. Golfs Tiger Woods, Rory Mclroy, Phil Mickelson. F1's Lewis Hamilton, Jensen  Button, Michael Schumacher god bless him.

Every single one worth more than you, me, and everyone here. Why? Everything is only ever worth what people will pay. Deal with it. ;)
thats what i said only man u fans pay to see him . i don't, he never been any good . like most players in the prem are overpaid , not just him  >:(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 21 February 2014, 22:08:12
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
No, because 75,000 people pay year on year to watch him play every week.

Same with Messi, Ronaldo, Gerard, etc etc. NBA's Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Scotty Pippin. Golfs Tiger Woods, Rory Mclroy, Phil Mickelson. F1's Lewis Hamilton, Jensen  Button, Michael Schumacher god bless him.

Every single one worth more than you, me, and everyone here. Why? Everything is only ever worth what people will pay. Deal with it. ;)
thats what i said only man u fans pay to see him . i don't, he never been any good . like most players in the prem are overpaid , not just him  >:(

Really bothers you doesn't it. ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 22:11:56
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
No, because 75,000 people pay year on year to watch him play every week.

Same with Messi, Ronaldo, Gerard, etc etc. NBA's Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Scotty Pippin. Golfs Tiger Woods, Rory Mclroy, Phil Mickelson. F1's Lewis Hamilton, Jensen  Button, Michael Schumacher god bless him.

Every single one worth more than you, me, and everyone here. Why? Everything is only ever worth what people will pay. Deal with it. ;)
thats what i said only man u fans pay to see him . i don't, he never been any good . like most players in the prem are overpaid , not just him  >:(

Really bothers you doesn't it. ;D
no don't bother me just thinking of the poor fans who pay his wages . if they want to be mugs its up to them  ;D ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 21 February 2014, 22:15:48
Worth every penny. :)
because your a man u fan . nobody is worth that much  >:( >:(
No, because 75,000 people pay year on year to watch him play every week.

Same with Messi, Ronaldo, Gerard, etc etc. NBA's Michael Jordan, Lebron James, Scotty Pippin. Golfs Tiger Woods, Rory Mclroy, Phil Mickelson. F1's Lewis Hamilton, Jensen  Button, Michael Schumacher god bless him.

Every single one worth more than you, me, and everyone here. Why? Everything is only ever worth what people will pay. Deal with it. ;)
thats what i said only man u fans pay to see him . i don't, he never been any good . like most players in the prem are overpaid , not just him  >:(

Really bothers you doesn't it. ;D
no don't bother me just thinking of the poor fans who pay his wages . if they want to be mugs its up to them  ;D ;D

Good, that's that sorted then. ::)
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: 05omegav6 on 21 February 2014, 22:45:45
The point that Golf is missing is that there are over 20,000 Starbuck in the world.

For every Starbucks there are 20,000. Man U  fans, so that's four hundred million people each paying 0.00075p each week to watch Rooney waggle his ears...

Even I would pay that to watch him do that  ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: bored bigyin54 on 21 February 2014, 22:56:24
The point that Golf is missing is that there are over 20,000 Starbuck in the world.

For every Starbucks there are 20,000. Man U  fans, so that's four hundred million people each paying 0.00075p each week to watch Rooney waggle his ears...

Even I would pay that to watch him do that  ;D
well i wont sorry  ;D ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Rods2 on 21 February 2014, 23:31:44
Capitalism is based on markets. Something is worth what somebody is prepared to pay for it. What is value for money to you, will be worth very little to somebody else. Roger Budden is case in point, there are very few people on here who will pay £4k for an Omega as they would rather spend £200-500 and fettle and fix it until it is at the standard they want, but there are people who will pay to get a low milage exceptionally good example, which needs no work done on it.

It is the same with work, this is a market as well and if you have an exceptional in demand skill then you can demand a lot of money for your services. I can't see many people on here turning down £300k a week for 5 years, so you are made for life, I certainly wouldn't if my particular skills were suddenly in demand. I say good luck to him and everybody else who can demand good money by working on developing their talent and skills, so they are well rewarded for using them.

Premiership football is a very good export earner for this country, so the more top stars we have in the UK, the more foreign earnings and investment they will attract, which we desperately need to help fix the UK's poor balance of payments, not to mention the extra tax helping to reduce the deficit and contribute to our public services. The people I begrudge paying money to support are lazy and breakless, those that are perfectly fit and able, but prefer not to work and expect us to keep them at a level of wealth and lifestyle many hard working poor people can only aspire to.

Without a broad earnings range from rich to poor all you have is poor people in a country and a privileged political elite as can be seen from all of the failed countries over the last 100 years with their failed communist and socialist experiments.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: cleggy on 22 February 2014, 00:45:34
Wayne Rooney affecting the balance of payments,that's nearly as funny as moving to the Ukraine. ;D ;D;D ;D ;D

Sorry I couldn't resist that one, and what is happening is far from funny. :(
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tunnie on 23 February 2014, 16:07:16

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.

Loss of customers? What loss in customers? ::)

Google our Q2 results ;)
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:08:13

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.

Loss of customers? What loss in customers? ::)

Google our Q2 results ;)
Q2? Last year?
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tunnie on 23 February 2014, 16:10:53

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.

Loss of customers? What loss in customers? ::)

Google our Q2 results ;)
Q2? Last year?

No, this year.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:14:50

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.

Loss of customers? What loss in customers? ::)

Google our Q2 results ;)
Q2? Last year?

No, this year.
We haven't had Q2 this year yet. Calendar year, Q2 would be April to June, financial year, Q2 would be July to September.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 23 February 2014, 16:16:36
Financial year perhaps? :-\
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:17:34
To be fair to Tunnie, I've just looked and Q2 does seem to be their latest results...  :-\
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tunnie on 23 February 2014, 16:20:35

Perhaps if a good few more people did it, reality may sink in, but I doubt it.

I doubt it as well. What will happen is that Sky will put loss of customers down to competition from BT Sport and so throw even more cash at it. That's how they think.

Loss of customers? What loss in customers? ::)

Google our Q2 results ;)
Q2? Last year?

No, this year.
We haven't had Q2 this year yet. Calendar year, Q2 would be April to June, financial year, Q2 would be July to September.

I said our Q2 results. Business Q's dont always match ;)

http://www.dividendmax.co.uk/dividend-investor-news/1771/british-sky-broadcasting-increases-2014-interim-dividend-by-9 (http://www.dividendmax.co.uk/dividend-investor-news/1771/british-sky-broadcasting-increases-2014-interim-dividend-by-9)
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:22:09
OK.  ;D I'm confused, as usual.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tunnie on 23 February 2014, 16:24:07
Try doing deals with companies, when your Q2 is their Q4  ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: tunnie on 23 February 2014, 16:24:59
Try doing deals with companies, when your Q2 is their Q4  ;D

Easily confused on conf calls  :D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:26:56
Try doing deals with companies, when your Q2 is their Q4  ;D
Well....it's just not right...the govinment should do something about it!  ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: chrisgixer on 23 February 2014, 16:29:06
Try doing deals with companies, when your Q2 is their Q4  ;D

You should try it when everyone else thinks Friday is Wednesday. ;D
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 16:31:00
Try doing deals with companies, when your Q2 is their Q4  ;D

You should try it when everyone else thinks Friday is Wednesday. ;D
Get her fickin ead down you.
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Rods2 on 23 February 2014, 21:23:12
Wayne Rooney affecting the balance of payments,that's nearly as funny as moving to the Ukraine. ;D ;D;D ;D ;D

Sorry I couldn't resist that one, and what is happening is far from funny. :(

The overseas rights for 2013-16 have been sold for more than £2bn. Over £666m per season or £33m per club. Not peanuts, unless you are Lord Opti.

http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2013/05/21/where-the-money-went-premier-league-prize-and-tv-payments-for-2012-13-210501/ (http://www.sportingintelligence.com/2013/05/21/where-the-money-went-premier-league-prize-and-tv-payments-for-2012-13-210501/)

The quality of the football attracts oversea TV revenue, which is why the Premiership and La Liga are the higher overseas revenue earners. Nobody overseas is much interested in the top Ukraine football league, which only has three clubs of note.  :P
Title: Re: FFS
Post by: Stemo on 23 February 2014, 21:26:50
Shakhtar Donetz and dynamo Kiev, don't know any more...