Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.5 V6 engine.  (Read 5248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

OmegaAnglesey

  • Guest
2.5 V6 engine.
« on: 05 February 2013, 22:47:54 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39512
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #1 on: 05 February 2013, 22:55:17 »

Probably not a lot of difference on paper, but you should always have more cylinders than doors on any car!  ;) ;)

Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #2 on: 05 February 2013, 22:56:10 »

well cared for 2.5 is good-3.0 have head gasket problems-Personally prefer 2.5 mine done 242055m so far and purrs like a kitten-  :y Also 2.5 more common to get :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #3 on: 05 February 2013, 22:56:44 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
 
ps: also a short ratio differential and 3.0 cams helps..
« Last Edit: 05 February 2013, 22:59:00 by cem »
Logged

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39512
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #4 on: 05 February 2013, 23:00:30 »

...  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D

I want to be in control ........

 ;) ;) ;)
Logged

OmegaAnglesey

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #5 on: 05 February 2013, 23:00:54 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
 
ps: also a short ratio differential and 3.0 cams helps..
I've had 2 manual Omega's in the past and ever since trying an Auto i felt it suited the Car better.  no doubt a manual is more Fun overall.
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #6 on: 05 February 2013, 23:01:52 »

Hi all.


Sorry if this has already been discussed but I thought it best to open a fresh thread.


Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?


I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.


Is the 2.5 V6 a reliable engine overall say compared to the 2.2i (obviously if maintained) ?
 
Is there much more oomph gain , better for overtaking, 0-60 difference etc...


Thanks in advance.

for better overtaking, 0-60 difference  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D
I got manual saloon -heavy clutch made my thigh ache(motorbike prang) so easier for me+auto quicker from standstill-+ look at cost of dmf clutch kit :'( :'(
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

Andy B

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury Lancs
  • Posts: 39512
    • ML350 TDM SmartRoadster
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #7 on: 05 February 2013, 23:02:16 »

....
I've had 2 manual Omega's in the past and ever since trying an Auto i felt it suited the Car better.  no doubt a manual is more Fun overall.

A V6 auto will drive nicer than a 4 pot auto ...... more grunt  :y
Logged

Entwood

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Wiltshire
  • Posts: 19566
  • My Old 3.2 V6 Elite (LPG)
    • Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 DTI
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #8 on: 05 February 2013, 23:03:06 »

No luxury saloon should have more pedals than feet ... seeemples :)
Logged

symes

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • oxford
  • Posts: 3488
  • Madness is a state of i dont mind
    • R reg 940 volvo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #9 on: 05 February 2013, 23:04:04 »

....
I've had 2 manual Omega's in the past and ever since trying an Auto i felt it suited the Car better.  no doubt a manual is more Fun overall.

A V6 auto will drive nicer than a 4 pot auto ...... more grunt  :y
+1 :y
No luxury saloon should have more pedals than feet ... seeemples :)
+1 :y
Logged
1998 volvo 940 turbo 225bhp +1965 Rover 5000 v8+ 1962 ford consul 375 lowrider

Brikhead

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West-Mids.
  • Posts: 1540
  • Sleeping. Do not disturb.
    • 2003 chitroen Saxo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #10 on: 05 February 2013, 23:04:49 »

Would I be gaining enough from a 2002 2.2i GLS Auto Saloon to move to a 2000 2.5 V6 ELITE Auto Saloon ?
I must admit I like the sound the 2.5/3.0 make over the 2.6/3.2 very much.

Coming from a GLS to an Elite will provide big improvements without even considering the engine.

I've had and driven a 3.0, 2.5 and 2.6's and they all make the same basic v6 noise, only difference comes from the back box tone.

I'd guess any four cylinder engine would need to be worked very hard to move the weight of an Omega.

Reliability of the engines is not really an issue with a 10 year old Vx. motor more to do with how it's been treated, even a 1.6 should do 150,000 if serviced (and thrashed) regularly!
Logged

cem_devecioglu

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #11 on: 05 February 2013, 23:05:06 »

...  manuals are a better choice.. I drive the 2.5 auto for years and hated.. but after converting to manual I like the car ;D

I want to be in control ........

 ;) ;) ;)

more than a second 0-60 difference is not something to throw up.. ;)
Logged

OmegaAnglesey

  • Guest
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #12 on: 05 February 2013, 23:05:10 »

One thing I'd like to clear up does anyone think the 2.5/3.0 sound much better than the 2.6/3.2 or is this just my imagination playing tricks ?
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36287
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #13 on: 05 February 2013, 23:06:59 »

I'd say there's a significant performance difference between 2.5 and 2.2, especially if the 2.2 is auto, which really takes the edge off the 4 pot. There is another significant difference going up to a 3.0 from the 2.5. If you're going auto, then the bigger engine will always be better.

All the V6s are pretty much of a muchness in terms of reliability, etc. IMHO As said, there was a phase around 1998/9 where 3.0s tend to spring coolant leaks from the rear of the head gasket, and around 2001 there was a batch of dodgy valve stem oil seals on the 2.6. These are minor issues that have affected relatively few cars, in my opinion. Get one that has been looked after and you should have few issues up to 200K and beyond. There are differences in the ancillaries between 2.5/3.0 and 2.6/3.2 but overall, some changes for the better, some for the worse - probably not a lot in it.

As engines go, the V6s are pretty solid, by my reckoning. They get a bad reputation for access to some parts being awkward but once you know your way round one they are fine.

Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

Brikhead

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West-Mids.
  • Posts: 1540
  • Sleeping. Do not disturb.
    • 2003 chitroen Saxo
    • View Profile
Re: 2.5 V6 engine.
« Reply #14 on: 05 February 2013, 23:07:40 »

Personally prefer 2.5 mine done 242055m so far and purrs like a kitten
My 3.0 preferred to roar. :y
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 18 queries.