Thank you for the reply.
1) What gains would the 3.2 cams have over the 3.0 though? any reason why the 3.0 cams are preferred over the 3.2? (aside from availability?)
2) You mentioned emissions. Does that mean the 3.2 cams make up less emissions yet still keeps the performance gains?
3) What gains would the 2.5 engine see using the 3.2 cams over the 3.0 cams?
4) If I used the 3.2 cams in a 3.0 what gains are to be had over the standard ones? Just trying to get an idea what the difference is.
5) Would the 3.2 crank have any benefit (aside from being more durable) in a 2.5 / 2.6 / 3.0? As in, was the forged crank any lighter?
6) Were the block/pistons/rods etc more
stronger in the 3.2 then the 2.5 / 3.0? Or are they the same in terms of durability?
Oh, and I have a couple of questions regarding the autoboxes. I know they have an NM rating difference (250nm vs 350nm) however:
7 ) Does the AR35 have different gearing ratio to the AR25? If so, what effect would this have when used on a 2.5 / 2.6?
8 ) Assuming the AR35 is built stronger, would the additional weight of the gears cause any performance loss if you used an AR35 in a 2.5 / 2.6?
WOW! What a load of my mind.
