Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Vamps]

By making an appointment at her surgery like normal people as said her objection is totally unfounded, as per my first post on Saturday morning

If 15 year old child refuses an injection how are you going to enforce it? where is the head banging smile?.................

[05omegav6]

In custody if needed? Point is the refusal is unfounded and irrational. Three judges can't all be wrong

[Vamps]

In custody if needed? Point is the refusal is unfounded and irrational. Three judges can't all be wrong

In whose Custody?

[05omegav6]

The courts, given that they've ordered it...

[Vamps]

The courts, given that they've ordered it...

So who is physically going to give her the injection?..................

[05omegav6]

A court appointed suitably qualified person

And get someone to have a word with the mother about contempt...

[MR MISTER]

Like I said, 'serious implications'. We're gonna tie kids down and stick pins in them now.

[cnj]

I have to say that this case scares me with its implications. does it now mean that if three learned judges decree, someone can now be forced to undergo a medical procedure against there will, albeit 'children' who supposedly do not have the power of rational thought, I find that perspective rather strange as most children i've met over the age of about 8/9 yrs know there minds quite well and are quite capable of making quite powerful decisions given the facts honestly !

[biggriffin]

Just another petulant teenager who needs a clip round the ear and told you will do it.

[chrisgixer]

The judges decision is based on the ill informed stance of the mother and hence the daughters.
When asked "if on contraction of either M,M or R had they considered the ingredients of the vaccine" the social worker(?) had stated they did not. I presume this utterly pathetic line of text presumably from the journo, implies, that if taken ill they would want the vaccine ? (I presume it would then be too late) but the point being they did not consider themselves life or death vegans.

Surely the decision of the courts would over ride the idiotic position of half hearted vegans in the families minds and AGREE to the jab? and a mother using her children to cost her ex a fortune!

The mother should pay costs !


But more over, I really don't see why subjects such as this are needed on here Esta.

Unless its to watch devisions develop...?  Somebody always gets ... How can I put it... "Overly passionate" ? about a subject. (Hopefully that's taken as not pointing at ANY individual/s)

It is GENERAL chat after all. Like a GP is a general practitioner. What this subject is asking for is a referral to a specialist. One more qualified than anyone here, perhaps?

[MR MISTER]

The judges decision is based on the ill informed stance of the mother and hence the daughters.
When asked "if on contraction of either M,M or R had they considered the ingredients of the vaccine" the social worker(?) had stated they did not. I presume this utterly pathetic line of text presumably from the journo, implies, that if taken ill they would want the vaccine ? (I presume it would then be too late) but the point being they did not consider themselves life or death vegans.

Surely the decision of the courts would over ride the idiotic position of half hearted vegans in the families minds and AGREE to the jab? and a mother using her children to cost her ex a fortune!

The mother should pay costs !


But more over, I really don't see why subjects such as this are needed on here Esta.

Unless its to watch devisions develop...?  Somebody always gets ... How can I put it... "Overly passionate" ? about a subject. (Hopefully that's taken as not pointing at ANY individual/s)

It is GENERAL chat after all. Like a GP is a general practitioner. What this subject is asking for is a referral to a specialist. One more qualified than anyone here, perhaps?

You do talk shite sometimes (most of the time). It's a general discussion area and, as such, I post things which I consider are of general interest. It's certainly a lot more interesting than your 20 page tomes on the minutiae of brakes or tyres. The very fact thst quite a few have replied is proof that most people find it interesting enough to comment (productively).
You are free to refrain, of course and, I for one, wish you would. You have very narrow interests, most of us do not.

[MR MISTER]

Oh....and you are gay.

[chrisgixer]

See, bickering already.

I think your level of Gayness is pretty clear, given your lack of control described on your other thread.

[chrisgixer]

But I would add, my interest is in line with the reason for the forums existence.

Why don't you bog off to the Daewoo forum.

[redelitev6]

  This is all about the all powerful state apparatus being denied , but at least we live in a "free" country