I think this accident has hit all of us hard where it has involved innocent people going about their personal business, a bit like the helicopter crash in Vauxhall a few years a go.
What might be a sensible thing to do is use bigger airfields for airshows and/or a low population, quiet road area adjacent to the airfield, so all aerobatics can be performed within the confines of the airfield / low population areas. This is how things are pretty much performed at Farnborough and since 1953, always on the non-crowd part of the airfield. Yes, they do fly outside of the confines of the airfield, but don't do aerobatics whilst doing so. I know at Farnborough that all displays have to be approved by an experience team who vet them and they also have the authority (which is used and was during a trade day a few years a go) to call a halt to any display at anytime if the pilot is deemed to be acting dangerously by making mistake(s), acting recklessly or if he departs from his approved flying program. When a display is halted, he is ordered to stop and land, no questions, no ifs, no buts!

The reasons why are discussed afterwards.

Does anybody know if all other airshows have the same high standards?
Having said that, pilots are human and will make mistakes and they are essentially showing off and there will also be other issues at times from equipment failures to bird strikes. Yes, make them safer, but like many dangerous things we humans do, no they shouldn't be banned. Sadly, the most dangerous thing we all do is travelling around and in the UK it kills 1 in 200 of us in our lifetimes, in many other countries it is much higher.
