Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Labour leadership battle.  (Read 4152 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

STEMO

  • Guest
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #15 on: 12 September 2015, 12:39:57 »

A pointless leadership election for a pointless party. Still, it will ensure the political commentators stay in employment.

People on twotter are saying stuff like "A vote for equality" or "A vote for the workers". Err...no.....you have to be in power to legislate for change.
Logged

Auto Addict

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Birmingham
  • Posts: 13554
  • Back to Vx to keep TB happy
    • Astra K Elite ST
    • View Profile
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #16 on: 13 September 2015, 09:07:30 »

Retards 1, Common Sense 0  ::)
Logged
I like red cars

Nick W

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Chatham, Kent
  • Posts: 11067
    • Ghastly 1.0l Focus
    • View Profile
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #17 on: 13 September 2015, 09:47:42 »

It wasn't much of a battle, and that shouldn't come as a surprise.

After all, the re-emergence of a traditional screw you, I'm alright Conservative party was only going to end one way for the Labour party. Which is what happened.

Is it going to result in an electable Labour party? Not until the country is so sick of the Conservatives that anybody else would be an improvement. That's probably 3 general elections away.

This is how British politics 'works.'
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32548
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #18 on: 13 September 2015, 11:29:32 »

Corbyn reminds me of that other unashamed socialist Dennis Skinner.

I believe both to be decent honourable men.

Will the country south of Hadrians wall vote vote for him in significant numbers?.....I very much doubt it. :-\

If by some miracle he did become PM (by which time he will be seventy-one) at least he would let the all powerful banks know  they were not above  the law.

Cameron, Blair, and even Gordon Brown  'arse licked' the banks to such an extent that London and it's financial institutions could do as they pleased. The financial meltdown of 2007/8 being the result.

How many bankers are in prison for bringing the country to it's knee's?.... >:(





« Last Edit: 13 September 2015, 11:37:39 by Doctor Opti »
Logged

STEMO

  • Guest
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #19 on: 13 September 2015, 11:49:29 »

Best question Skinner has ever asked in the house:

"As you are no doubt aware, the remains of King Richard the third were discovered this week in Leicester. Will the prime minister confirm that ATOS have declared him fit for work?"
Logged

Field Marshal Dr. Opti

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Utopia
  • Posts: 32548
  • Speaking sense, not Woke PC crap
    • View Profile
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #20 on: 13 September 2015, 11:54:52 »

Best question Skinner has ever asked in the house:

"As you are no doubt aware, the remains of King Richard the third were discovered this week in Leicester. Will the prime minister confirm that ATOS have declared him fit for work?"

A question like that would certainly give Cameron the 'hump'....... ;) ;D

I believe that King Richard now works at Burger King on a zero hours contract. :)
Logged

Rods2

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sandhurst Berkshire
  • Posts: 7604
    • 1999 3.0 Elite Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Labour leadership battle.
« Reply #21 on: 13 September 2015, 14:17:26 »

Gordon McRuin's tripartite regulation of the banks, loose money policy with too low interest rate to keep the economy growing on the back of a housing bubble, massive expansion and overspending of borrowed and taxpayers money on public services so they were running a large deficit at the top of the economic cycle and his Canute like efforts to justify it by extending the economic cycle and abolishing boom and bust not only exposed that he and his arrogant team were totally and utterly incompetent, but total and utter fools as well. Like the Conservatives with their ERM fiasco they deserve to be out of office for a generation (or more) as the electorate quite rightly punish unnecessary financial hardship through Government stupidity and incompetence. :y :y :y

And when disaster struck they were true to form, total incompetents, when it came to the Northern Rock situation, followed by Natwest and then organising a shotgun marriage to save Edinburgh based HBOS which dragged down Lloyds-TSB as well. :(

The banks obviously played their part as well, especially Fred the Shed and is an abject lesson on just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should do something. :o :(

McRuin's working tax credits have also been a disaster which have held back wage rises and the Conservatives are correct to reform this and to push up the minimum wage and promote the working wage, which more organisations are adopting. Working tax credits subsidize low wage paying companies, which distorts the labour market and is wrong. :(

I agree that the reform of sickness benefit has been unnecessarily callus, which is why I backed the campaign to get deaths released for those stopped their sickness benefits. Bad political policies and systems need to be exposed, regardless who is in power.

Interesting paper recently by the well respected Brookings Institute in the US which shows that US Corporations now target quarterly share prices, earnings and dividends at the expense of wages and long term investment and long term earnings. It is basically a combination of three things; changes to corporate and investment laws, management targets and bonuses and aggressive very active investors who all too readily reach for their lawyers if targets aren't met. This has resulted in the biggest growth industry in the US is public company share buy-backs! 50% of sorting problems is identifying them, so hopefully changes will be made or companies outside of the US will benefit long term with greater R&D spending, better products and earnings. :y :y :y

Although I'm a free market capitalist, I'm more of the Joseph Cadbury mold than Tiny Rolands, where there has to be a social dimension to businesses and markets, they can't operate in isolation from the effects they have on people, the environment and the world. Having had experience of dealing with companies in most parts of the world I prefer the UK's and Japanese 'gentlemanly' capitalism to the dog-eat-dog US style. IME generally in Europe the further south the company is you are dealing with the more you have to watch them and the tighter have to be any credit terms. ???
Logged
US Fracking and Saudi Arabia defending its market share = The good news of an oil glut, lower and lower prices for us and squeaky bum time for Putin!
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.01 seconds with 17 queries.