when there were far, far fewer cars around, children, including me, forgot all about what the parents and school had taught us (no changes there!!) and ran out into roads for footballs, balloons, or just because we wanted to.
Children today are the same; I know from my experiences with my children and now grandchildren that you can teach and teach children again and again and still they will not do as they are told. They will, from time to time, run into the road or simply cross when they think there is enough time to do so, and the accident happens.
I don't think its so much the extra traffic (if anything, that slows things), its the way we molly coddle our little bastids in cotton wool, putting them in the car to drive them to school 800yrds away, and drop them off right by the gate (ignoring the keep clear markings), and shielding them from learning things are dangerous.
I also think the quality of drivers has plummeted. I think most of us "of a certain age" couldn't afford a car, so took to the roads on motorbikes. I think newly qualified drivers lack that complete awareness that motorcyclists usually have. And far too many distractions whilst driving, such as updating their arsebook, twaatter, and drinking their hot Costa.
As for speed limits, I'm all for sensible ones. For the most part, I'm against long stretches of 50mph where it should be NSL, and I'm mostly against 20mph limits, that are purely in place because those that should be on the cull list like the sound of their own voice.
Now TB that is very true, an angers me. My mum, and I with my kids, walked half a mile to the school and back, twice a day, without any need for a car. There is a whole generation now that know nothing but having a car on the drive and going everywhere in it; and society wonders why we have fat kids (and adults)!! It is so noticeable when the children have school holidays; the "rush hour" is almost non-existent!

As for driving a motorbike; now that is something I would question. I have never driven a motorbike but consider myself, with one million miles under my seat, a good driver, with added input from police training. I think though the difference is now that youngsters think it a right to have a licence, and when they get one believe they are the best drivers in the World, zooming around in racing hatchbacks. In my day we scrapped together money (in my case £15) for the humblest little car I could afford and knew I was lucky to have a licence, along with understanding getting the licence was just the start of learning to drive to the standard more mature and wiser drivers met. I was a novice, and knew it. How many teenagers think that now? The ones I know certainly don't. They think they are God's gift to the roads, and they are the only ones who really know how to drive. That is why so many under 25 year old's have accidents.
If the test really reflected all the needs of a good driver, including attitude, in the 21st century there would be less of a problem. But I understand there is some talk about including Sat Nav operation withing learning to drive and the test. What!!!

For goodness sake, what is that all about?!

That is the wrong approach and is not what is required!