Apparently it is now confirmed that the damaged drone found near the area was nothing to do with the investigation.
Also, some of the reported sightings may have been sightings of police drones which were looking for the drone which was originally reported.
Far canal, embarrassing doesn't begin to cover it. Im still wondering if there was ever actually a drone at all.
It really is puzzling, just like an old fashioned who drone it
Think I`ll join up with some mates & go lookin for old bottles in the woods
https://youtu.be/rMNJ8wRfjEA
Wow, watched about 10secs. Still, each to their own.
My youngest brother and I never got that kind of response when digging around along the Western Front in Belgium and France and unearthing live grenades, bullet, and shell rounds from WW1 battlefield sites!!
Mind you that was in the 1990's!
On the time team special about WW1 they are still ploughing this stuff up
There now seems to be less freedom for folks to get out & explore their environment
I noticed a bloke filming in the local town, tripod; long lens etc. I was scoffing my lunch on a bench nearby
Very soon he had a PCSO & then a cop demanding to know who he was & what he was doing. He point blank refused to identify himself & said he wasn`t breaking any laws, so he had freedom to film anything fron a public footpath he liked. In the end the law boogered off & left him to it
Now was he correct to say that
they didn`t cart him off, so maybe we do have certain rights.