Hi Killer Watt,
Looked at your issues from page 1. I think that throughout the tread, that everything has been answered.
With all due respect, you haven't answered jack s**t.
Sticking to an arbitary number does NOT make for a safe driver....driving according to the conditions however does contribute towards road safety.
If I told you that in a 5 mile journey I took my eyes off the road for a second 3 times in that journey to look at a bit of pussy, you'd be thinking I was some sort of c**t (and rightfully so).
If however I told you that I took my eyes off the road for a second (because thats how long it takes) to ensure I was doing 30mph bang on the money for that same journey, do you really believe that makes me so much safer?
Just a quick question - why would you have to check your speedo to ensure you were doing
exactly 30?
Why not do 25? or 20? The speed limit is precisely that - a LIMIT. if you insist on driving at exactly the limit, then you - and you alone - are creating a situation where the chance of you veering over that limit are far greater than if you were driving slower.
I'm sure that if you were driving slower then an increase in speed would be more apparent.
I'd have to leap in and say, also, that this is a legal matter. The camera is there to enforce an existing law - the speed limit on the road - therefore, surely, the limit is the issue here, not the device used to enforce it, whether a police officer or a static camera.
To add a point about your earlier question about siting cameras outside schools - surely you've answered it yourself. If people are already slowing by default outside a school, why would a camera be required to enforce that limit? Can you tell me how many schools in the country actually DO have cameras outside them?
Devils' advocate - as over50now was.

I absolutely respect your right to your opinion!