Jimbob - if you think it was the patch, to be honest, there was probably corruption on the system that existed before to be honest.
Gaffers - In my (pretty extensive - its what I do) experience, Linux patches tend to cause more grief due to differing dependencies. Please don't fall into the trap of believing that Linux (all varients) doesn't need regular patching 
Dont worry I'm not that narrow minded 
I dont mind tinkering with something I haven't had to pay for to get it working, besides it increases my IT knowledge which since switching careers has been massively neglected.
I just dont beleive that I should have issues with an operating system or program that I have paid for, developers are paid to ensure that it works not release it and then patch it or release warning notes that it 'might not be compatible with x, y, z.....'
In an ideal world, no software would have faults. But TB's general rule of thumb is the more expensive the software, the more faults it has

Matters little if its Windows, Linux or a proper Unix.
I guess I am (un)lucky enough to have to deal with multiple OSes - Windows, various Linux and proper Unix - on a daily basis, so can generally pick out the most suitable for a given task/use. OOF runs on Linux, as it fits Linux's niche very well (low cost internet services). However, it also highlights the fundamental flaws in the Linux kernel (in this case made worse due to the architecture of the forum software we use). OOF could run on virtually any OS, but think Linux/Unix will always be the most suitable for it in its current form.
Oh, note that 'professional' Linux is far more expensive than virtually all versions of Windows (except Enterprise versions of Windows Server)
