Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Bye, bye, Nimrod  (Read 1621 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Broomies Mate

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bristol, UK
  • Posts: 3840
    • Stuff!
    • View Profile
Re: Re:
« Reply #15 on: 09 December 2010, 23:15:20 »

Quote
Quote

Have also worked on & flown in Nimrods, BUT.. just because I don't agree/disagree with someone, there's no real need too lay into someone just because YOU THINK you know better !!!

I think you need to learn a little RESPECT....and quickly.....

I THINK I know better?  I was right in what I said, and I claim the newspaper got it wrongt.  How could I possibly be wrong?  You worked on them, you know the score.

Dont type RESPECT in caps and try to condescend me.  It wont work.  :)

I have apologised to those I possibly offended, but I stand by my statements.
Logged
2004 Saab 9-5 Aero Merlot Red Stg1 noobtune
2009 Saab 9-5 Turbo Edition Titan Grey Stg3 noobtune
2017 Vauxhall Vivaro L1H1 125PS Star Silver

Shackeng

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramsbury
  • Posts: 7763
    • 3.2 Elite 2.0 TitX Mondeo
    • View Profile
Re: Bye, bye, Nimrod
« Reply #16 on: 10 December 2010, 09:25:09 »

Quote
The Nimrods are unneccesary and just a waste of money.  I'm glad they are being stripped.  Just hope the bloke running the weighbridge pays a fair price.

Detection of any Nuclear Sub can only be made when it is near or on the surface.... it's a visual detection.  You can do that with a £50,000 Cessna.

I cant say I'm happy about all the 'defence' cuts, but this one makes sense.

Unfortunately this appears to be what the Government also believes. Not true incidentally.
Logged

Shackeng

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramsbury
  • Posts: 7763
    • 3.2 Elite 2.0 TitX Mondeo
    • View Profile
Re: Bye, bye, Nimrod
« Reply #17 on: 10 December 2010, 09:35:41 »

Quote
As said, if I have offended anyone then I apologise!

This is a subject I am particularly passionate about.

Then, with respect, I suggest you inform yourself a little better. The statement regarding 'eavesdropping' is entirely correct. However as you point out, this is difficult with submerged submarines. The MR4A is (was) equipped with state of the art ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition, and Reconnaissance) capability also, which is not solely, or indeed even primarily, designed for use against submarines. Why do you think Nimrod was deployed in the current conflict?:y
Logged

Varche

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • middle of Andalucia
  • Posts: 14022
  • What is going to break next?
    • Golf Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Bye, bye, Nimrod
« Reply #18 on: 10 December 2010, 12:55:29 »

What gets my goat is the vast sums of money involved. Either we need the weapons/kit or whatever or we don't. The people responsible for such profligate waste from poor decisions ought to be shot at dawn.

Next we will commit to £25billion (actually it will turn out to be £50billion) for Trident replacement then scrap that half way through BUT have to pay the full £50billion because of poorly drawn up contracts.

Personally I think it is high time we acted like an equal in our EU Partnership. If there is a problem we will send our share of men and machines. Nothing more and nothing less. Just who do we think we are?
Logged
The biggest joke on mankind is that computers have started asking humans to prove that they aren’t a robot.

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34037
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: Bye, bye, Nimrod
« Reply #19 on: 10 December 2010, 13:01:02 »

The inside info I got from certain members of the design team (former collegues) is that it is not fully functional.
Logged

Shackeng

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Ramsbury
  • Posts: 7763
    • 3.2 Elite 2.0 TitX Mondeo
    • View Profile
Re: Bye, bye, Nimrod
« Reply #20 on: 10 December 2010, 13:59:48 »

Quote
The inside info I got from certain members of the design team (former collegues) is that it is not fully functional.

Neither was all the kit in the MR1's initially, but it became a superb maritime platform. The 4A, because of its huge capabilities, had some bugs to be sorted, but you don't scrap your Omega because the radio fails to work.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 17 queries.