I couldn't agree more Zulu, as I have stated before that I personally hate violence and what it has done to mankind.
The point I made was effectively we are dealing with children (in my book no one really grows up until they are at least 25 years old) who have been educated yes - but given what examples!! That you must fight for what you believe; that violence is necessary at times; that the leaders of our country can break promises; that our politicians (today's ruling classes) can screw the lot of us, and to be strong, wayward, and fighting for our rights, is a worthy cause as featured in so many works of both fact and fiction.
Sorry everyone when I say this but we are all a reflection of our history and the society we have created. The students are born of us and are testament to our views, desires, aspirations, and personal greed, with war like nature. I will not hammer my personal favourite philosopher Thomas Hobbs (1588 - 1679) again, but instead quote my favourite philosopher for the business I undertook; Machiavelli (1469-1527) who preached that out of evil comes good, and out of good comes evil, coupled with the belief that the end often justifies the means. This is what we (humankind) are, this is how we operate, and the students, young, naive, clumsy, uncouth, are displaying our traits. Good will come out of the evil.

The present state of the country shows that there is something wrong with the natural progression of our young people being taught the value of respecting other people and the institutions of state.
This failure in many cases comes from the breakdown of the conventional parent/child relationship and a society that values little other than the satisfaction of immediate desires.
The end result in my mind at least is a world where the immediacy of information - without understanding the full import of it - conspires to allow great numbers of people to act in circumstances, the inevitable consequences of which, allows undesirable things to happen.
The more this happens, the more it is allowed to happen and the more we become ambivalent to it then it is more likely for good to ultimately lose the battle with evil.
I think Zulu there is common agreement between the two of us on many of the factors concerning the modern age and its evils, along with its great advantages. However, I will touch on your comments and expand my viewpoint:
Why is it "natural progression" for the young people to be taught respect for the institutions of state Zulu?
That frame of mind, with the unquestioning stance of the people towards the establishment and its works, respecting God, King and Country, received a hefty blow with the Great War, where by 1917/18 the common people were being to grasp how that misplaced faith had cost them, along with their loved ones, a terrible price due to imperial greed that was significantly borne by the young. In more modern times the masses have learnt that their 'Lords and Masters' are no better than them, allowing industry to be wrecked with thousands of jobs lost, with little loyalty for the working classes, and a penchant for fraud and lies. The young, who have been cast aside in these forlorn communities should have respect? For this?
During the 1950s the governments of the day encouraged widespread consumerism of a population that had been through the hell of total war, and believed in make do and mend, with only purchasing what could be afforded that very day. They had been brutalised, families wrecked, and communities shattered. Now the 'modern' government stated "we have never had it so good" ( Harold Macmillan) and effectively stated go forth and spend. Spend they did throughout the 1960s, 1970s,1980s and 1990s, with credit being readily available, and a completely tolerant society where anything goes! The old values went, sacrificed to a new government sponsored world of "all is possible, TODAY"!! Now today we are all faced with the consequences of those decades which we have all been party to, and we wonder why the youth of today have little respect for our values?
The young students have grown up on this history, and we are surprised that the old loyalties and respect have faded?! Why should they have respect for a 'plastic' world of demigods and falseness at all levels of society. Who can they look up to and respect? Celebrities???
If there had been a immediacy of information during 1914-18 the war would have ended speedily, with tens of thousands of lives saved, as the masses protested against the excesses of the King, General Haig, and Country. With modern immediacy of information during the 1930s perhaps the truth of developments within Germany would have been more widely recognised and acted upon, Suez would not have taken place, and the Vietnam War would have been halted in its tracks sooner than it eventually was by media exposure. Full immediacy of information perhaps would have allowed for the masses to know the complete truth about their MP's, and would inhibit the lies and deception for instance as the students have rudely learnt!
No, "immediacy of information" is the one hope to control our political Lords and Masters, with complete transparency gained. The young of today have been 'corrupted' as we have, but maybe the young of tomorrow will be brought up with new values of loyalty and respect for the elements of life that matter. That though is down to you, I and all living adults today.
Out of evil will come good! That is something we can be sure of!