Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: astra sri 1.8 57 plate  (Read 2512 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« on: 02 January 2011, 17:48:59 »
Anyone know if these are any good,as i am now car shopping for something to replace the thirsty mig. :-/
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37573
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #1 on: 02 January 2011, 18:00:07 »
Astra is your average FWD hatch, 1.8 should be fairly nippy.

But on the note of fuel and 'thirsty' Omega, there are a lot of people saying they are going to get rid for something better on fuel due to costs, but i don't get why people chop them in.  :-/

Looking at auto trader:

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201041370623597/sort/priceasc/usedcars/price-from/6000/model/astra/make/vauxhall/page/1/radius/1501/postcode/tw89de/quicksearch/true?logcode=p

£6k gets you a basic spec Astra.

The most expensive 3.2 Elite Omegas around cost £3-4k - Lets say its worst case of £4k, that is still £2k cheaper than an 'Economical' FWD hatch.

When running the numbers for my LPG conversion, a £700 conversion cost, which saw a 30-40% saving in fuel cost, would still take approx 7,000 miles to re-cover my costs, assuming I saved 10p a mile, worst case it would take me 10,000 miles to recover.

So anyone spending just £2k more on a more economical car, is going to have to do roughly 20,000 miles before you break even, and thats best case!

V6 Omega does drink fair bit of fuel, but its cheap to buy, cheap to maintain. That counts for a lot, so don't get too hung up on mpg  :y
« Last Edit: 02 January 2011, 18:01:19 by tunnie »
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34016
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #2 on: 02 January 2011, 19:20:59 »
AVoid the 1.8, the 1.6 is a bit less power but much better economy.

The 1.7 and 1.9 cdti's are ok
Logged

YZ250

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Oxford/Bucks border
  • Posts: 4639
    • Black 3.2 Elite Estate
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #3 on: 02 January 2011, 20:26:29 »
As Mark said, the 1.7 & 1.9 CDTi's are OK. My son had a 1.7 CDTi SRi and it was a good motor. It was only 100 bhp but went well and was economical. With 18" wheels it looked the part as well.
Logged
My fun car is a 2020 Bmw F32 430d M Sport with indicators.
My cruiser is an Audi A6 Avant S Line Black Edition with indicators.

the alarming man

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • medway kent
  • Posts: 3644
    • disco V8
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #4 on: 02 January 2011, 22:54:13 »
when i broke my arm i had a 1.8 elite auto...one of the best cars i have ever driven...bit small though coming form a mig  :y
« Last Edit: 02 January 2011, 22:54:54 by the_alarming_man »
Logged
'the more people i meet...the more i like the dog'

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #5 on: 03 January 2011, 09:11:14 »
The 1.6 & the 1.8 are very thirsty little engines, mainly due to the fact they haven't got a 6th gear. Defiantly get a diesel, my mate has an 08 plate 1.6 VVT and he struggles to get 33 MPG on the motorway and he drives Miss Daisy. I got more from a 2.8 Turbo SAAB. Get a 1.9 CDTi :y
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34016
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #6 on: 04 January 2011, 09:40:44 »
Nah, nothing wrong with the 1.6's but yes, the 1.8's are a bit of an issue.
Logged

birchie1080

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #7 on: 23 July 2011, 00:20:00 »
hi there lads!! is the astra sri 1.8 58 plate any gud gud for a lpg conv???
Logged

bertie1.8vectra

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • wolverhampton
  • Posts: 230
  • life is but a dream....
    • Jeep cherokee 3.7
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #8 on: 23 July 2011, 06:23:24 »
i think mine has the same engine as the astra and yes the 1.8`s are thirsty little buggers and i somtimes wish i ahd waited and bought that 3.2 elite estate that josh had last year...but i fell for the veccy c as i had owned a veccy b espec with the deal i got on her as mrs bertie keeps saying some people bring sticks of rock and postcards back off holiday... he bloody brings a car!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D
Logged
Now to buy shares in BP!!!!!!!!!

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34016
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #9 on: 23 July 2011, 08:56:49 »
Quote
hi there lads!! is the astra sri 1.8 58 plate any gud gud for a lpg conv???

All the Vx power plants convert to LPG ok....et the end of the day, vx were one of the few manufacturers who sold cars new with an LPG kit fitted (although not factory fit)
Logged

mantahatch

  • Guest
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #10 on: 23 July 2011, 09:51:43 »
Quote
Nah, nothing wrong with the 1.6's but yes, the 1.8's are a bit of an issue.


Could you elaborate on what the issue is.

I now have two 1.8s in the household, one 2004 Astra H Design auto and one 2009 Life auto.
I understand the engines are slightly dfferent but have had no issues whatso ever with the 2004 and we have owned it fo 3.5 years. 2009 only just arrived but it seems very good.

Any advice gratefully received.

 :y

Oh yes I know the 1.4 is woefully under powered.
« Last Edit: 23 July 2011, 09:53:57 by mantahatch »
Logged

Marks DTM Calib

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • West Bridgford
  • Posts: 34016
  • Git!
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #11 on: 25 July 2011, 11:11:59 »
The major issue is the poor fuel consumption for little gain in power over the 1.6.

Other than that no major problwms tbh.
Logged

mantahatch

  • Guest
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #12 on: 25 July 2011, 11:18:14 »
Quote
The major issue is the poor fuel consumption for little gain in power over the 1.6.

Other than that no major problwms tbh.


Understood. Thank You
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #13 on: 25 July 2011, 11:49:52 »
The 1.6 I honestly think is terrible on fuel, and it's quite underpowered too.
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

mantahatch

  • Guest
Re: astra sri 1.8 57 plate
« Reply #14 on: 25 July 2011, 13:26:54 »
Both our 1.8s do mainly town driving, tops about 40mph we are lucky to see 28/29mpg. Omega on same roads/journeys 18/19mpg so is better than it was for us.

My 2009 is quoted as a "140" and the 2004 as "120". I am assuming BHP so power to weight probably as good as an Omega. Downsides are obvious though. The 2004 Design model has almost as many toys as the Omega. 2009 Life model has nothing at all except electric front windows and central locking.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 16 queries.